There is an American currently visiting your country who holds your nation's security in total disregard, although he repeatedly claims to "have your back". This lying fool has charmed American Republicans into believing that he is sincere about liberty, economic progress, constitutional rule and national security, but he cares about none of these things, neither for America nor Israel.
Trust this devious man at your own risk, and please keep him there, we don't want him back.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Liberals Believe Only In Their Personal Power
Liberals, as we know them under the Obama administration, are devoid of any ideas that would improve our society or our economy, and will flip-flop on any issue in order to win votes or make their fellow citizens dependant on them for hand-outs. These people hold nothing sacred, demonstrate no patriotism, believe in no truth and no right or wrong outside of their power, and hold the constitution in total disregard.
Following are some of the unprincipled flip-flops made by these people to gain favor and win votes so as to acquire or maintain power:
John Kerry- He was for the Afghan war before he was against it.
Barack Obama-Was against gay marriage until he "evolved" in favor of it.
Hillary Clinton-favored traditional marriage until she learned to favor same-sex marriage.
Democrats-Were opposed to the 1964 Civil Rights act until they saw the political gains to be had in it, and now pretend they were the only ones in favor of civil rights all along.
Barack Obama-Promised to close GITMO until he decided it was more politically advantageous to leave it open.
Barack Obama-Promised to not rest until job creation was increased and the jobless rate reduced, while his EPA was killing jobs via new, strict regulations. And he seemed to be well rested as he repeatedly golfed and jetted off to Hawaii.
Barack Obama-States that the United States needs to become more energy independent, but will not approve Key Stone or fracking, and will not allow new drilling on federal lands.
Barack Obama-Stated that Obamacare would reduce healthcare costs by $2500 per family per year, and we now know that a family's projected annual cost will increase by ten times that amount. He said we would be able to keep our existing insurance if we wanted to (but we can't) and we could keep our current doctor under his plan, but we probably won't be allowed to under the Obamacare exchange fiasco.
Barack Obama-Wants improved education for minorities trapped in poverty and bad neighborhood schools, but kills the education voucher plan designed to help explicitly these needful students.
Democrats-Profess to want better jobs for young people just starting out and for people in poverty, but at the same time they increase the rate of pay under minimum wage law, thereby killing jobs that those entering the job market sorely need.
Barack Obama-Stated that Iran and North Korea would not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, but has done nothing to stop their development but talk. Neville Chamberlain anyone?
Barack Obama-Repeatedly predicted horrendous results from sequestration, and then said "never mind" when nothing bad happened (except the petty things he personally caused to happen, like White House tours for children).
Democrats-Are all for freedom of religion but condemn Christmas scenes and the display of the Ten Commandments in public places.
Democrats-Want strict gun control laws, but release hundreds of convicted criminals from prison (blaming Republicans and the sequester), some of whom are violent criminals, now on the loose again to commit more crimes.
Liberal News Media-Claim Constitutional protection to print the news (they tolerate the Constitution when it favors them), but in practice will not report all of the news, but instead employ a self-censorship in which they refuse to report any news harmful to their political holdings.
Liberals are intentionally destroying the U.S. society and our economy, and word must be spread to true, patriotic Americans that liberals/Democrats recognize no standards of right and wrong and that our economy will continue to flounder until the likes of Obama, Pelosi and Reid are removed from office. The very fact in the past that Democrats were often solid, patriotic citizens until Obama showed them the path to raw power through dividing the nation and creating resentment among the population based on race, sex and wealth, shows how lacking in real belief-systems and compassion liberals are. We must make the nation aware for this flaw in their nature and vote them out of office.
Following are some of the unprincipled flip-flops made by these people to gain favor and win votes so as to acquire or maintain power:
John Kerry- He was for the Afghan war before he was against it.
Barack Obama-Was against gay marriage until he "evolved" in favor of it.
Hillary Clinton-favored traditional marriage until she learned to favor same-sex marriage.
Democrats-Were opposed to the 1964 Civil Rights act until they saw the political gains to be had in it, and now pretend they were the only ones in favor of civil rights all along.
Barack Obama-Promised to close GITMO until he decided it was more politically advantageous to leave it open.
Barack Obama-Promised to not rest until job creation was increased and the jobless rate reduced, while his EPA was killing jobs via new, strict regulations. And he seemed to be well rested as he repeatedly golfed and jetted off to Hawaii.
Barack Obama-States that the United States needs to become more energy independent, but will not approve Key Stone or fracking, and will not allow new drilling on federal lands.
Barack Obama-Stated that Obamacare would reduce healthcare costs by $2500 per family per year, and we now know that a family's projected annual cost will increase by ten times that amount. He said we would be able to keep our existing insurance if we wanted to (but we can't) and we could keep our current doctor under his plan, but we probably won't be allowed to under the Obamacare exchange fiasco.
Barack Obama-Wants improved education for minorities trapped in poverty and bad neighborhood schools, but kills the education voucher plan designed to help explicitly these needful students.
Democrats-Profess to want better jobs for young people just starting out and for people in poverty, but at the same time they increase the rate of pay under minimum wage law, thereby killing jobs that those entering the job market sorely need.
Barack Obama-Stated that Iran and North Korea would not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, but has done nothing to stop their development but talk. Neville Chamberlain anyone?
Barack Obama-Repeatedly predicted horrendous results from sequestration, and then said "never mind" when nothing bad happened (except the petty things he personally caused to happen, like White House tours for children).
Democrats-Are all for freedom of religion but condemn Christmas scenes and the display of the Ten Commandments in public places.
Democrats-Want strict gun control laws, but release hundreds of convicted criminals from prison (blaming Republicans and the sequester), some of whom are violent criminals, now on the loose again to commit more crimes.
Liberal News Media-Claim Constitutional protection to print the news (they tolerate the Constitution when it favors them), but in practice will not report all of the news, but instead employ a self-censorship in which they refuse to report any news harmful to their political holdings.
Liberals are intentionally destroying the U.S. society and our economy, and word must be spread to true, patriotic Americans that liberals/Democrats recognize no standards of right and wrong and that our economy will continue to flounder until the likes of Obama, Pelosi and Reid are removed from office. The very fact in the past that Democrats were often solid, patriotic citizens until Obama showed them the path to raw power through dividing the nation and creating resentment among the population based on race, sex and wealth, shows how lacking in real belief-systems and compassion liberals are. We must make the nation aware for this flaw in their nature and vote them out of office.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Our Phony, Charmin' Barry, Now The Best Bud Of Republicans
After repeatedly and shamelessly attacking and blaming Republicans for the catastrophic things that were to happen when the sequester took place, and then having his hat handed to him when none of his dire predictions actually happened, our charmin' Barry is now all hugs and kisses with Republicans, meeting with them, having dinner with them, wanting to now (after 4 years of stiffing them) work with them for a better America, yada, yada, yada.
The only thing Republicans should concentrate on is impeaching Obama for his repeated unconstitutional acts and for getting Americans killed in Benghazi and the Fast and Furious fiasco, and ignore his false and obvious attempts to sway public favor to his side with this too-late appeal for compromise and friendship. Obama is not the friend of any conservative or Republican and he never will be. All he knows how to do is attack them.
The only way to remain free is through constant vigilance, and we must vigilantly oppose all of the policies of the fool in the White House, and we must therefore encourage our Senators and Representatives to do exactly that. There is no way to be the friend of someone who has sworn to fundamentally transform America and who has taken giant steps toward that end. Obama has dictatorial tendencies and must be stopped on all of his policy fronts, and we must repeal the horrible Obamacare that he illegally pushed through Congress.
The only thing Republicans should concentrate on is impeaching Obama for his repeated unconstitutional acts and for getting Americans killed in Benghazi and the Fast and Furious fiasco, and ignore his false and obvious attempts to sway public favor to his side with this too-late appeal for compromise and friendship. Obama is not the friend of any conservative or Republican and he never will be. All he knows how to do is attack them.
The only way to remain free is through constant vigilance, and we must vigilantly oppose all of the policies of the fool in the White House, and we must therefore encourage our Senators and Representatives to do exactly that. There is no way to be the friend of someone who has sworn to fundamentally transform America and who has taken giant steps toward that end. Obama has dictatorial tendencies and must be stopped on all of his policy fronts, and we must repeal the horrible Obamacare that he illegally pushed through Congress.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Is There A First Amendment Right For The Press To Not Report the News?
There is no doubt that the press has Constitutional protection to print the news, and this right must not be infringed upon. But does the press, and we're discussing the liberal press here, have a right to NOT report the news, to selectively report only the news that is favorable to their side and to fail to report news that hurts the liberal slant on things?
Some examples of this non-reporting the news are the repeated apocalyptic predictions of Obama about how devastating the sequester would be, compared with how tame the reality of the sequester really is, but yhere is no mention in the dominant press of the government email in which the White House warned the Department of Agriculture to not allow outcomes that "contradicted" Obama's dire predictions to occur. In other words, the White House wants as much pain to be experienced by Americans as possible so the can blame the Republicans for the entire sequester thing, which we all know was Obama's idea.
Another ongoing news cover-up is the fact that the global warming/climate change agenda (the exact term used by liberals keeps changing with their politics) was all a contrived lie and that there has been no warming, human-caused or otherwise, for years. Yet Obama and the United Nations are still trying to tax the world, and in particular the United States, to rectify this blatant lie.
A third non-reported piece of news is all of the lives saved each year by people carrying guns used to defend themselves. All we hear about are the nuts who kill innocent students and theater attendees, but nothing about the good gun-owning people who rid us of violent scum (often leftists) who attack them. And for certain there is never a comparison of the deaths from guns between highly regulated gun-law states and right-to-carry states. It's much more dangerous to visit a highly regulated state or city than a less regulated one.
And there are other critically important stories not being reported by the liberal press, such as Benghazi and what Obama did all night long as his own appointees in were being killed, and Fast and Furious and why guns were illegally allowed to go to known killers in Mexico, resulting in a U.S. border agent getting killed.
Is there no logical, unspoken requirement that the news being reported be complete and accurate? In my opinion it would be preferable to get no news at all than to be fed only what liberals want us to hear and read.
I'm just saying.
Some examples of this non-reporting the news are the repeated apocalyptic predictions of Obama about how devastating the sequester would be, compared with how tame the reality of the sequester really is, but yhere is no mention in the dominant press of the government email in which the White House warned the Department of Agriculture to not allow outcomes that "contradicted" Obama's dire predictions to occur. In other words, the White House wants as much pain to be experienced by Americans as possible so the can blame the Republicans for the entire sequester thing, which we all know was Obama's idea.
Another ongoing news cover-up is the fact that the global warming/climate change agenda (the exact term used by liberals keeps changing with their politics) was all a contrived lie and that there has been no warming, human-caused or otherwise, for years. Yet Obama and the United Nations are still trying to tax the world, and in particular the United States, to rectify this blatant lie.
A third non-reported piece of news is all of the lives saved each year by people carrying guns used to defend themselves. All we hear about are the nuts who kill innocent students and theater attendees, but nothing about the good gun-owning people who rid us of violent scum (often leftists) who attack them. And for certain there is never a comparison of the deaths from guns between highly regulated gun-law states and right-to-carry states. It's much more dangerous to visit a highly regulated state or city than a less regulated one.
And there are other critically important stories not being reported by the liberal press, such as Benghazi and what Obama did all night long as his own appointees in were being killed, and Fast and Furious and why guns were illegally allowed to go to known killers in Mexico, resulting in a U.S. border agent getting killed.
Is there no logical, unspoken requirement that the news being reported be complete and accurate? In my opinion it would be preferable to get no news at all than to be fed only what liberals want us to hear and read.
I'm just saying.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)