Answer: Liberals care! Liberals always care when race or sexual orientation are involved. To prove my point, Obama called the athlete to congratulate him for his "Courage' in coming out.
Courage? This carefully planned move is a resume enhancer for the third-rate basketball player. It required no courage at all, just a left-leaning press to fawn over him and pretend he's a hero. And how did Barack Insane Obama find the time to call this nothing athlete, anyway? Benghazi and the deaths of four Americans haven't been explained yet; Obama hasn't fixed the jobless situation yet (and he promised to not rest until this was accomplished); our national debt is about to crush us and the financial futures of our children; Boston and New York, and who knows what other cities, may still be in the sites of terrorists, and our fool president is calling an athlete to congratulate him for a stunt he has pulled in an attempt to get his expiring contract renewed. Who cares if he's a homosexual or not? Certainly not any modern conservative.
We are truly experiencing a time of complete insanity from our political elites. All they do is travel at our expense, hold a few meetings for camera exposure and pass legislation that is causing our economy to grind to a halt, and they collect a large salary in exchange. Oh, I almost forgot: and we have a president who is so uninvolved in the dangerous world we live in that he has the time to call a man and congratulate him for his recent publicity stunt. What a bunch of idiots we have elected.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Friday, April 26, 2013
Liar, Liar, Pantsuit On Fire. Put Hillary In Jail!
Here's what we know about the Clintons: Bill's lies and sexual misconducts have made him the darling and saint of the Democrat party, and so far Hillary's denial of requested security to the Libyan consulate, and her repeated lies under oath to Congress about this bad decision, which led to the deaths of four Americans serving there, have seemingly assured her the Democrat nomination for the presidency in 2016. Can Republicans sit back and allow this kind of misconduct and malconduct to continue to be rewarded with adulation and greater responsibility by these filthy, self-serving people? Let's pray not.
Congressman Issa must put Hillary on charges for lying under oath to his investigating committee about her denial of security to Benghazi and for her knowledge that the attack on the consulate there was not caused by a You Tube video, as she stated and as the Obama administration was officially presenting at the time. This idiocy must stop and crimes must be punished.
But of course lies and misconduct, like Barack Insane Obama's intentional destruction of America's economy, his take-over and ruin of private industry, his willful destruction of the greatest health care system in the world, his reduction of national security, which opened the way for the Boston bombings and the silencing of the surviving bomber in that awful event to assure no further terrorist information could be obtained from him, and his apparently successfully blaming Republicans with the lies he's telling about the problems being perpetrated on America by sequestration, are not hurting this evil man's standing with the ever-worshiping Democrats. So let's hope Hillary's abhorrent performance as Secretary of State will break the winning trend for the always-wrong Clintons. Put this incompetent, lying woman in jail!
Does Hillary ever wash her hair?
Congressman Issa must put Hillary on charges for lying under oath to his investigating committee about her denial of security to Benghazi and for her knowledge that the attack on the consulate there was not caused by a You Tube video, as she stated and as the Obama administration was officially presenting at the time. This idiocy must stop and crimes must be punished.
But of course lies and misconduct, like Barack Insane Obama's intentional destruction of America's economy, his take-over and ruin of private industry, his willful destruction of the greatest health care system in the world, his reduction of national security, which opened the way for the Boston bombings and the silencing of the surviving bomber in that awful event to assure no further terrorist information could be obtained from him, and his apparently successfully blaming Republicans with the lies he's telling about the problems being perpetrated on America by sequestration, are not hurting this evil man's standing with the ever-worshiping Democrats. So let's hope Hillary's abhorrent performance as Secretary of State will break the winning trend for the always-wrong Clintons. Put this incompetent, lying woman in jail!
Does Hillary ever wash her hair?
Monday, April 22, 2013
Diversity And Other Liberal Propaganda
It's often difficult trying to understand the points liberals try to make. There have been several newspaper articles lately about the subject of diversity. Diversity is everywhere and surrounds us at our every movement, but of course when liberals use the word "diversity" they are referring to their old fall-back position of race and racism, which is all liberals understand.
In one of the articles written by The Kansas City Star they made a point of preaching the praises of diversity in a local school (Olathe North) which is already racially diverse, and had to refer to other schools, having a more imbalanced racial mixture in their student bodies, as being less fair and less "diverse". But even these less "diverse" schools still have diversity, just not to the level the liberals would prefer; they'd rather the government take control and assure that there is an equal numeric balance of the races in American schools.
So do liberals want to push for the billion dollar waste and tragedy that bankrupted and destroyed the Kansas City Missouri school district? Do they want more busing of students across school boundaries? There are no longer metropolitan schools that are solely white, so what are liberals continuing to complain about? In America we have minorities who are multi-millionaire athletes, actors and performers, a black president, minority members of Congress and the Senate, minority Supreme Court Justices, black corporate leaders and university professors. So where's the beef?
Complaints by liberals are no longer about inclusion or exclusion of a class of students, but instead seem to be an attempt to remain relevant in a changing nation. In fact the shoe should be on the other foot: Conservatives' beliefs in freedom of religion, an understanding and study of the U.S. Constitution, an appreciation of the exceptionalism of America on the world stage, and America's acceptance of minorities from all over the world need more emphasis in the nation's schools.
Diversity has been achieved and the nation has moved beyond it. The leftists should declare victory and relax, but if they claim victory they lose an issue, so they continue their racist rant and keep churning the pot and making young people who don't know better feel resentful for imagined abuses.
American society has left liberals behind in terms of "diversity", and we could likely greatly reduce poverty as well as discrimination if government didn't entice people to depend on welfare handouts and would instead encourage them to get educated, become employed and become as successful as their abilities allow.
But for liberals, especially the politicians, the votes and loyalty of the dependent class are too attractive and rewarding to allow these dependents to escape the yoke of big government. Therein lies the problem that is destroying tens of thousands of young lives and assuring that they live in poverty and dependence.
It's a shame that "diversity" considerations make the local press focus on what divides us (race, ethnicity and income level) rather than on what unites our nation and its students. And it also improperly concentrates on what students want, and not on the solid academic education they need in order to succeed and prosper. The diversity issue is a disservice to students.
In one of the articles written by The Kansas City Star they made a point of preaching the praises of diversity in a local school (Olathe North) which is already racially diverse, and had to refer to other schools, having a more imbalanced racial mixture in their student bodies, as being less fair and less "diverse". But even these less "diverse" schools still have diversity, just not to the level the liberals would prefer; they'd rather the government take control and assure that there is an equal numeric balance of the races in American schools.
So do liberals want to push for the billion dollar waste and tragedy that bankrupted and destroyed the Kansas City Missouri school district? Do they want more busing of students across school boundaries? There are no longer metropolitan schools that are solely white, so what are liberals continuing to complain about? In America we have minorities who are multi-millionaire athletes, actors and performers, a black president, minority members of Congress and the Senate, minority Supreme Court Justices, black corporate leaders and university professors. So where's the beef?
Complaints by liberals are no longer about inclusion or exclusion of a class of students, but instead seem to be an attempt to remain relevant in a changing nation. In fact the shoe should be on the other foot: Conservatives' beliefs in freedom of religion, an understanding and study of the U.S. Constitution, an appreciation of the exceptionalism of America on the world stage, and America's acceptance of minorities from all over the world need more emphasis in the nation's schools.
Diversity has been achieved and the nation has moved beyond it. The leftists should declare victory and relax, but if they claim victory they lose an issue, so they continue their racist rant and keep churning the pot and making young people who don't know better feel resentful for imagined abuses.
American society has left liberals behind in terms of "diversity", and we could likely greatly reduce poverty as well as discrimination if government didn't entice people to depend on welfare handouts and would instead encourage them to get educated, become employed and become as successful as their abilities allow.
But for liberals, especially the politicians, the votes and loyalty of the dependent class are too attractive and rewarding to allow these dependents to escape the yoke of big government. Therein lies the problem that is destroying tens of thousands of young lives and assuring that they live in poverty and dependence.
It's a shame that "diversity" considerations make the local press focus on what divides us (race, ethnicity and income level) rather than on what unites our nation and its students. And it also improperly concentrates on what students want, and not on the solid academic education they need in order to succeed and prosper. The diversity issue is a disservice to students.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Headline: Boston Bombers Caught Not "White Guys". Liberal Media Devastated.
It's impossible for a reasonable, sensible person to imagine the racism and hate of liberal/progressives who insist that "white guys" be blamed for a mass murder, when the skin color of the perpetrator is without relevance. Conservatives just want killers caught and punished, but liberals insist on introducing their racism into the consideration of guilt and the capture of criminals.
The killers in Oklahoma City, Littleton, Aurora and Newtown were found to be white, but conservatives still wanted them to be punished severely regardless of skin color. Before the guilty parties were determined and caught, I heard no conservative make a statement of what he or she preferred to be the race or ethnicity of the actual culprit(s). We just want them caught and removed from society. But liberals are not so broad minded.
So while the liberal press seem uninterested in black-on-black crimes (as is the extreme case in Obama's Chicago) they are quick to point their racist fingers at the white population (and specifically conservative whites, as happened in the Aurora shooting in which a reporter quickly, and inaccurately, blamed the TEA party for the crime) for headline-getting crimes in an attempt to achieve some of their beloved "diversity". But the facts just don't support their racist rhetoric.
The liberal media should have their second amendment rights denied them if they can't just report the news and not report opinion, and we need to insist that they also report all the news, not just the news that favors their preferred side of the issue.
The killers in Oklahoma City, Littleton, Aurora and Newtown were found to be white, but conservatives still wanted them to be punished severely regardless of skin color. Before the guilty parties were determined and caught, I heard no conservative make a statement of what he or she preferred to be the race or ethnicity of the actual culprit(s). We just want them caught and removed from society. But liberals are not so broad minded.
So while the liberal press seem uninterested in black-on-black crimes (as is the extreme case in Obama's Chicago) they are quick to point their racist fingers at the white population (and specifically conservative whites, as happened in the Aurora shooting in which a reporter quickly, and inaccurately, blamed the TEA party for the crime) for headline-getting crimes in an attempt to achieve some of their beloved "diversity". But the facts just don't support their racist rhetoric.
The liberal media should have their second amendment rights denied them if they can't just report the news and not report opinion, and we need to insist that they also report all the news, not just the news that favors their preferred side of the issue.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Encouraging Interview With Pope Francis. Maybe We Can Survive Obama After All.
The internet has been known to promote a hoax now and then, but if an interview by Chris Mathews with the pre-Pope Cardinal Bergogloi is valid, there is a chance that decent people can win against for forces of evil headed by Barack Obama. Here are some of the statements of the then-Cardinal:
Under capitalism "no buyer.. enters into any exchange against his will". The Cardinal stated he believed people should be taught "how not to become poor and how not to allow government to trick them into poverty".
The Pope told Mathews "you are a socialist and your friends are socialists. And you are the reason for 70 years of misery in Russia and Europe now is seizing in pain from your policies. You believe in the redistribution of wealth and it makes entire populations poor". "You destroy a man's incentives to take care of his very own family, a crime against nature and nature's God." "You are making everything against the law. Together this ideology creates more poverty today than all the corporations you vilify have in the history of man".
The Cardinal stated that the Catholic Church's mission is "to provide a beacon out of depravity, socialism and sin". He goes on with "the best government was created by the Americans in which they admitted that people are endowed by their creator", and that this relationship "has been eroded by the atheists on the left".
He stated that "Latin America is lost. The people of the entire area are controlled by a bloc of militant socialist regimes.."
He tells Mathews "you are an American. Your government, my child, has been infiltrated by men of sin". "you have created a new type of state, the so-called welfare state. This has happened in order to respond to the needs of the politically created poor". "People are made poor so they will vote for the very candidate that made them poor".
The interview prints to 6 pages and contains many very interesting observations by the Pope and zings to Mathews and his leftist pals. You can Google it with BERGOGLIO CHRIS MATHEWS or at this link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3000243/posts
There may be a chance for America to overcome the evils lurking in Washington after all.
Under capitalism "no buyer.. enters into any exchange against his will". The Cardinal stated he believed people should be taught "how not to become poor and how not to allow government to trick them into poverty".
The Pope told Mathews "you are a socialist and your friends are socialists. And you are the reason for 70 years of misery in Russia and Europe now is seizing in pain from your policies. You believe in the redistribution of wealth and it makes entire populations poor". "You destroy a man's incentives to take care of his very own family, a crime against nature and nature's God." "You are making everything against the law. Together this ideology creates more poverty today than all the corporations you vilify have in the history of man".
The Cardinal stated that the Catholic Church's mission is "to provide a beacon out of depravity, socialism and sin". He goes on with "the best government was created by the Americans in which they admitted that people are endowed by their creator", and that this relationship "has been eroded by the atheists on the left".
He stated that "Latin America is lost. The people of the entire area are controlled by a bloc of militant socialist regimes.."
He tells Mathews "you are an American. Your government, my child, has been infiltrated by men of sin". "you have created a new type of state, the so-called welfare state. This has happened in order to respond to the needs of the politically created poor". "People are made poor so they will vote for the very candidate that made them poor".
The interview prints to 6 pages and contains many very interesting observations by the Pope and zings to Mathews and his leftist pals. You can Google it with BERGOGLIO CHRIS MATHEWS or at this link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3000243/posts
There may be a chance for America to overcome the evils lurking in Washington after all.
Friday, April 5, 2013
Barack Insane Obama: Back-Stabbing America One More Time
So now our idiot president, after boasting that his miraculous policies and his clever handling of the economy was bringing us back to prosperity again, and in particular causing the housing market to rebound after the Clinton administration took the step that eventually doomed it in 2008 (to be specific, it was the Clinton administration that told the savings and loan industry in the 1990s that they would either begin loaning mortgage money to low income people and those with bad credit ratings, or they would be punished with IRS audits, which threat led eventually to sub-par loans and then to the bundling of good and bad loans, and then to the collapse of the housing market altogether and our current economic dilemma) and now our slow-student Obama is telling mortgage lenders that they must again loan money to those who are likely to default on these loans, and that if the borrowers default the federal government will cover or forgive the loss to the lender.
What could be more convincing proof that Obama is a radical, socialist-communist than this fool move? It's absolutely certain to cause another major failure in our already fragile economy, probably cause another recession and possibly cause a collapse into a depression. And all of this trouble heaped on to the back of a nation whose president caused a major national ratings reduction for the first time in America's history. This is absolute insanity and is proof that Obama wants to make additional Americans dependent on big brother so he can generate democrat votes from the uninformed in 2014, and when the next wave of evicted home-owners causes the resentment and anger it will necessarily generate, he'll blame the rich and the lenders for the outrage for having had these good-fairy-believing borrowers' home-ownership dangled in front of them by Obama, only to see it yanked away again by the lender when they fail to make the payments.
There can no longer be any question that Obama is intent on destroying this great nation with his radical policies, and the portion of our economy that will be most harmed are the very persons he pretends to be helping: the poorest among us. But to our Barry, people are just tools to move and manipulate as he sees fit for his own political gain.
What could be more convincing proof that Obama is a radical, socialist-communist than this fool move? It's absolutely certain to cause another major failure in our already fragile economy, probably cause another recession and possibly cause a collapse into a depression. And all of this trouble heaped on to the back of a nation whose president caused a major national ratings reduction for the first time in America's history. This is absolute insanity and is proof that Obama wants to make additional Americans dependent on big brother so he can generate democrat votes from the uninformed in 2014, and when the next wave of evicted home-owners causes the resentment and anger it will necessarily generate, he'll blame the rich and the lenders for the outrage for having had these good-fairy-believing borrowers' home-ownership dangled in front of them by Obama, only to see it yanked away again by the lender when they fail to make the payments.
There can no longer be any question that Obama is intent on destroying this great nation with his radical policies, and the portion of our economy that will be most harmed are the very persons he pretends to be helping: the poorest among us. But to our Barry, people are just tools to move and manipulate as he sees fit for his own political gain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)