When a mass shooting occurs the first thing liberals
want to do is prohibit legal gun possession.
This type of action would of course take guns from the law-abiding, who
have never hurt anyone, and would leave guns solely in the hands of criminals,
who have no problem hurting everyone. If
guns were to be taken from law-abiding citizens a renewed burst of gun crimes
would likely be the result as criminals began to take advantage of the lawful removal
of the obstacle to their commission of crimes (the citizen’s guns) and a
free-for-all would result.
In the aftermath of a mass shooting we usually learn
that the killer was a terrorist, a known criminal or someone who was known to
be mentally unbalanced or down-right nuts for some period of time prior to the
commission of the crime. So it seems to
the interested observer that if liberals would not be so soft on crime (he was
from a poor, disadvantaged family and should be given a light sentence or no sentence
at all), or if they would allow medical assistance and needed confinement for
those who would hurt themselves or others (he was kept in a modern snake-pit
which denied him his human and civil rights, so he should be released to the
streets where he can be “happy”, hungry and homeless) we would be better off as
a society and halt many such crimes.
A denial of the 24-hour media coverage of mass
killings is also a good idea and would tend to limit the gratifying publicity
that these perps often seek. But the current round-the-clock coverage, combined
with a liberal president who mass-releases criminals from prison regularly, and
the same radical liberal president who allows illegal aliens to freely enter
our country and seek refuge in sanctuary cities, which in turn comfort and protect
them, assures crimes will continue to be committed. Some intelligent
restrictions in these areas would go a long way toward putting a stop to this “gun”
problem.
Liberals are soft on crime (the daily Chicago and
Baltimore gang killings are neither recognized nor commented on by our liberal smart-set
in New York and Washington), yet they
are heavy-handed on non-criminals (libs would confiscate legal weapons from
peaceful, responsible citizens), while at the same time liberals want to overlook
the drooling, smelly, filthy man muttering to himself, searching the local
dumpster for food, accosting people on the street and sleeping in the park or on
a sidewalk, and deprive him of the option of sleeping in a warm bed and be
required, under supervision in a proper facility, to take his prescribed medications
to counteract his dementia.
I think Washington and New York liberals are the crazy
ones, and when and if they start thinking realistically and not emotionally, we’ll
be able to begin to solve some of these problems. But liberals are so certain of their
correctness, their superior intelligence and their immaculate compassion, I
fear we’ll never be able to gain ground on the crimes of our times, which
rarely or never occurred before the takeover of our nation by liberal crap-talk
and non-thought.
