Our predictable leftist press is, of course, angrily
opposed to Ben Carson, this time because they are unable to find proof of his
claim that in his youth he committed some violent acts. So let me understand the logic of this folly:
if Carson were able or willing to prove his past violence would the press then consider
that he would be a great candidate for president? But since there is no proof
of violence, are the liberals instead saying that his apparent history of nonviolence
makes him a bad candidate? Do you
suppose that if the leftist press were able to locate someone who said he or
she had been attacked by Carson, that the press would then praise Carson for
his acts of violence and his subsequent conversion to religion and his becoming
a world respected surgeon? Who the hell
knows what these leftist idiots would say, except that if Carson is a
Republican and a conservative, he’s a bad person and not acceptable for any
elected office.
You can bet that whatever is learned about Carson’s past
he will be criticized for it. The whole thing is so stupid that one wonders at
the sanity of our liberal press corps.
Are they calling him a liar of are they just laying the ground so they
can be critical of him for being either violent or nonviolent, whichever they
can prove?
On the other side of the political aisle, when Juanita
Broaddrick accused Bill Clinton of raping and beating her (and this type of
activity is in keeping with much of what we know about Clinton’s personality
and his past actions) the press just yawned, turned their backs on Broaddrick
and resumed their attacks on Republicans.
They were unable to disprove the allegation of violence, which they momentarily
and timidly tried to do, but they were certainly not going to present the
accusation to him and press the case to make him admit his violent act. And of course the press is not interested at
all in Hillary’s lying about Benghazi and her risking national security by sending
and receiving classified emails on an unsecure server. And forget that Hillary
has lied in the past and seems to be making a habit of it in her presidential
run (remember her lying claim that she landed under enemy fire in Bosnia?).
Could the race of a black, successful non-liberal presidential
candidate play any part in the press’s attacks on Carson?
