Ever wonder why liberals are so opposed to guns but
don’t try to ban knives that kill people or jet aircraft that knock down skyscrapers,
killing thousands? And ever wonder why
liberals are so intent on blaming inanimate objects like guns for crimes and
not the human operators of the guns? It’s
because there are two basic sources of power in the world: government and military. In the western democracies the preferred
source of power is government (which liberals love), which is backed up quietly
by guns in the hands of the military (which liberals claim to not like so much).
The opposite power source is found in the less democratic world where rebels
and their guns are the main source of societal change, resulting in power being
placed in the hands of the newly installed rebel government. Americans are used to the powers of elected government
while many other nations only see powerful military groups in control.
In the United States liberals gain power through
elections, and once elected they merrily take control of the government and use
the legitimate processes of the government to begin absorbing rights and powers
formerly enjoyed by private citizens, and place these rights and powers under
the umbrella of the government. No one
really feared that Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton would go beyond the relatively
benign power grabs that liberals are prone to strive for once they gain power, and
no one thought they would really try to take over and subvert our established national
and constitutional practices. But along comes Barack Obama with his promise to “fundamentally
transform America” followed quickly with his Fast and Furious project; his
directed bankruptcy of General Motors and the giveaway of the proceeds to his
buddies in the unions; his takeover of Healthcare; his illegal and disastrous opening
of our borders to the world; his denying of tax advantages to conservative
groups via the IRS; his redistricting of American neighborhoods via HHS rules;
his disastrous nuke deal with Iran (which he falsely claims will prevent them
from getting a nuclear weapon); his retreat from a successfully stabilized Iraq
and blaming George Bush for the disastrous results of his ill-advised action;
his failure to recognize and state that radical Muslims are killing Americans
and others around the world via their Jihad on us; and many other examples of
Obama’s lies and power grabs could be given. Each of these examples represents the
big lie Obama told when he swore to defend the Constitution, as further demonstrated
by his repeated attempts to deny American citizens their right to keep and bear
arms.
Regardless of what labels liberals try to put on
dictators, all dictators are liberals/leftists.
Hitler cannot in any way be related to American conservatism because he
concentrated power into his government and denied his own citizens any rights
to protect themselves from his absolute power, which is the opposite of any
conservative ideal. And the eventual
military struggle between Hitler and Stalin can in no way be seen as a battle
between left and right: Hitler and Stalin were two leftists who were competing for
the domination of Europe with their eyes on dominating the world. Since all
dictators are liberal/leftists, it should come as no surprise that Obama’s
streak of power grabs has frightened American conservatives, who want to use
their right to bear arms as an assurance that Obama’s power grab is limited and
can be opposed by the citizenry if necessary. Unlike Carter and Clinton, who
were just two good ole boys who loved life and were having a good time in
office, American conservatives strongly believe that Obama, via his promised “fundamental
transformation of America”, will use his governmental power to absolutely
become a dictator, so we citizens want the second source of power, the gun, at
the ready in case Obama does use the greatest power source, the government, to
make his takeover a fait accompli.
