Last week Obama was in Hiroshima, once again
apologizing for America’s past actions in the world. Whenever the subject arises
of the United States using an atomic weapon, it must be remembered that Japan
started the war with their unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor, and it was Harry Truman
who had the courage to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to save millions of
lives, Japanese as well as American, and to put an end to the war. As Obama
strutted around like a big shot in front of the Japanese, I couldn’t help but
wonder, in the current-day proliferation of nuclear weapons, if Obama would
have the courage to order the launch of our missiles against a nation which had
already launched a first-strike nuclear attack on the United States. I
seriously doubt it. I believe this fool, America-hating man, would sit on the
decision until a part of the United States was destroyed, and he would, instead
of destroying the attacking nation, likely seek forgiveness and understanding
from the attacker for whatever fantasy reason they had for launching against
us. Thomas Sowell, the prolific author, is on record as believing that in a
situation such as this, where America is threatened with imminent nuclear
destruction, Obama would not only fail to counter-attack, but he would
immediately surrender to the attacking nation. This sounds exactly like the
Obama I know.
Another approach in considering what Obama would do
under attack, is to consider his hate and disgust for our military and the
volunteers who fill its ranks. It’s likely that just on the basis of the
response to an attack being a military action, he would decide to not counter,
and let the US be destroyed. As Commander in Chief of our armed forces, the
President is sworn to defend our Constitution and defend the security of the
nation, which, as a pacifist leftist, is a difficult, if not an impossible,
thing for him to do.
Considering the haste and ease with which Obama signed
an agreement to give a nuke to Iran, who could believe that he could then
launch one of our missiles against them if they attacked us? This action would
be an admission that he was wrong to give them nuclear capacity in the first
place, and Obama will never admit that an action of his was in error. And of
course, since an Islamic missile would be considered a missile of peace from the
religion of peace, how could the militant United States afford to attack it and
expose ourselves to being called war mongers and Islam haters?
I fear that Obama’s long-demonstrated hate for America
and dislike of our power and wealth would cause him to fault on the side of any
enemy. Obama believes it’s just not fair that America should have such power
and comfort in a world of poverty and misery, so he would probably delay a defensive
decision and cause the destruction of America.
Any man, and especially the President of the United States,
who boldly stated that he intended to “fundamentally transform America”, would
very likely not oppose a nuclear attack on America, using the illogic that the
best way to “fundamentally transform America” is to destroy it and then rebuild
it in a sane and humane way with the likes of Obama as its fuhrer. And in my opinion, that’s the hate-America thinking of our Barack
Insane Obama. Given the destruction to our laws and our constitution that Obama
has caused while working internally inside our government, I have no doubt he
would side with an enemy that launched an attack that could destroy us
externally as well.
