Let’s imagine a few years into the future and consider
a Hillary Clinton administration in which all guns have been confiscated from
law-abiding American citizens, leaving these decent people defenseless and
without personal protection, and leaving only criminals and terrorists in
possession of fire arms.
Obviously criminals and terrorists will continue to behave like the criminals and
terrorists they are, since they will still have their weapons, but keep in mind
that this violation of the second amendment will occur in an environment where
liberal race-baiting politicians have generated a violent hate for police
officers across the nation, a trend begun and carefully developed in the Obama
administration, and at a time when our brave police officers across America
have developed a self-defense attitude of backing off on aggressively
investigating crimes and encountering suspects out of fear of themselves being
prosecuted for their zeal in trying to apprehend bad guys; in other words
citizens will have even less protection from a cowed police force than they do
today, and added to this danger they will also no longer be personally armed
for self-defense.
Crime will not stop with the liberal/progressive
disarming of Americans, and it’s probably safe to assume that crime in a
defenseless world will likely increase, so when violence with fire arms
continues under this imagined Hillary administration, how will she and her
liberal friends respond? Who will they blame for the continued, or even
increased, crime wave? They will no longer have public ownership of guns to
blame for the violence, and since liberals are doing nothing about the escalating
gun violence in big cities like Chicago at the current time, who believes that
they will crack down on an increased level of gang-related gun violence in the
future? It wouldn’t surprise me if
liberal/progressives were to declare this violent new defenselessness to be a “new-normal”
that we will have to learn to live with.
Hillary must be defeated in November, period.
