Typical liberal trash talk from the Clinton campaign
about some innocent and truthful remarks from Donald Trump have enlivened the
press in the last two days. Trump merely made the obviously accurate statement
that since Hillary and her liberal/progressive allies want to take all guns
from the possession of normal people, why not remove Hillary’s guns (possessed
of course by the private and secret service bodyguards that surround her every
minute) and see how secure that makes her feel. After all, liberals always make
the argument that your gun threatens you and your family just by being in your
home, so the many guns that surround Hillary all day, every day, must be an
even greater threat to her. So, following her own logic, Trump suggested
getting rid of this evil threat that hangs over Hillary.
There has been much discussion the last year of so
about white privilege and how white people have benefits and privileges that no
other group in America has. But from my perspective, I see only liberal
privilege. Some examples are the
multi-million dollar Manhattan penthouse that Chelsea Clinton lives in. Chelsea
pulled down a six-figure income from NBC without once appearing on the air nor
writing a substantive article for the network. She was paid this enormous
salary, right out of college, to buy access to her liberal family: liberal privilege.
Hillary not being prosecuted for her email crimes and
her national security violations while serving as Secretary of State is another
example of liberal privilege, while, at the same time, the Department of
Justice is going after Sheriff Joe Arpaio with all the heft they can generate
because he DID abide by the law and made every effort to capture and punish law-breakers
in Arizona. The liberal gets a privilege to skate free, while the non-liberal
goes to jail, in the opinion of the Obama DOJ.
Then there’s the example of Hillary Clinton, a
liberal, anti-gun politician, who gets to have many guns defending and
protecting her as the beneficiary of this privilege, while everyone else feels
the constitution being eroded by the liberal push to outlaw guns. And in
anticipation of the liberal comeback that Trump is also surrounded by secret
service guns, the difference is that he supports the second amendment, and
Hillary, the liberal, doesn’t.
As is typical and expected when dealing with liberals,
Hillary’s campaign spokesman, Robby Mook, claimed that Trump was “inciting
people to violence” with his remark about Hillary’s guns. But Mr. Mook is
admitting something that liberals never like to speak about when they condemn
gun ownership for the violence committed by criminals carrying guns: our
society, especially during the Obama administration, has become extremely
violent in general and violently anti-police in particular, and the need for a
personal defense system has become more critical than during the years prior to
Obama. And, as can be expected, the Associated Press even jumped on the Hillary
bandwagon by stating that Trump’s statement was a “call for Clinton’s
assassination”, an intention that only occurs in the liberal-privileged mind.
Of course the Clinton campaign objected to Trump’s
comments, they always do. And they inevitably misrepresent what the Republican,
any Republican, says, especially Trump, who has a way of going to the heart of
Democrat lies and their confusion, and prodding them painfully, but always softly,
verbally and non-violently.
