Recently Obama’s press secretary, Josh Ernest, said
that Obama’s position on the war with ISIS was limited to Obama’s latest “narrative”,
warning America that war could be won or lost based on the turning of a phrase
in the administration’s “narrative”, or there may be no war at all, depending on
the phrasing of the “narrative”.
Was it this “narrative” thing that Obama read from when
he repeatedly swore that we could keep our doctor and our plan, period, under
Obamacare? Was it part of the “narrative” when Obama promised that we could
clamp sanctions back on Iran quickly if they were caught cheating on the famous
nuke deal that Obama signed, the deeply flawed agreement that Obama considers
to be his legacy? Does the “narrative” mean different things at different times
depending on the audience and Obama’s need to convince gullible citizens, or
the left-leaning press, of a new untruth that he’s pushing?
In Obama’s world, a narrative is simply a lie told to
manipulate opinion, as was the case with Obama’s predecessor, Slick Willy
Clinton and his ability to play the press like a cheap fiddle. They marveled at
his ability to lie, re-lie and lie again and not miss a beat, while at the same
time intimidating establishment Republicans into total silence and offering no
opposition to what were obvious lies that can, and are, hurting American
citizens.
Obama’s obvious love of Islam has lead him to copy
from the Islamic playbook and “lie for the faith” of liberalism via his “narratives”.
