The enemies of America, many of whom are American
citizens who vote the Democrat Party line, are beside themselves with President
Trump’s decision to halt immigration from certain majority-Muslim nations based
on the threats those nations pose to America. This new order by our president is
a very sensible thing to do, given that the FBI says there are ISIS camps in
all 50 states and we need to prevent even more enemies of America from entering
our nation.
Here’s my question to the always-hate-Trump crowd:
Would it be responsible for a president to respond slowly to an imminent attack
on America, or should he move quickly and decisively to pre-emptively halt any
possible attack and protect American lives? It seems to me that the latter
approach provides better protection against a terrorist attack than the former,
and that’s what President Trump is proposing with his executive order.
Barack Obama was a slow responder to terrorist threats,
and Orlando and San Bernardo were the result of his inability to recognize the
threats and move decisively to stop or prevent them. Obama was also content to
“contain” ISIS, which clever policy didn’t keep them from spreading and
polluting the entire world with their murdering ways.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, is a responsible
president and is dedicated to the proposition that we keep suspect individuals
out of our nation until such time as we can properly vet them, because there is
no current possibility of properly vetting anyone from Syria if there is no
government in Syria with whom to vet.
Donald Trump promised to perform extreme vetting of
people from the Middle East and now he’s keeping his campaign promise, and I
respect him more each day for keeping his word and for taking the flack of the
leftist radicals who cannot appreciate the good thing our new president is
doing for the nation.
