When
Bill Clinton, while the President of the United States, was accused
of abusing women and was subsequently not only proven to be an
abuser, but lied under oath to a federal court and was convicted for
that lie, the liberal press dutifully reported the news and then
insisted that the nation get back to the business of the people, and
very quickly forgot about the intentional crimes of Clinton and about
the hurt he caused various women.
But
when an employee of Donald Trump, not the president himself, but a
White House staffer (Rob Porter) is accused, not judged to be guilty,
but so far only accused, of abusing his former wife, the liberal
press has orgasms for days on end accusing Trump of who-the-hell
knows what, but accusing him just from pure hate for him, and they’ll
keep the subject alive as long as they can.
One
can recall the Clinton days when the likes of James Carville and Paul
Begala argued daily that what the president did in his personal life
(this goes back to the Monica Lewinski event again) has nothing to do
with how he conducts himself in office, and they urged that America
let Clinton get back to serving them and forget his woman troubles.
But
when a staffer of Donald Trump is accused of a personal, domestic
action, which has nothing to do with Donald Trump nor the staffer’s
work in the White House, the press will not let the subject rest, and
attacks Trump personally, savagely and persistently.
When
the Clinton aid Vince Foster, not only did he work for the Clinton
White House, but he was a personal friend of the Clintons, was found
dead in a Washington park not long after Bill Clinton became
president, the press did not ride him about security checks into why
Foster might have gotten into trouble to the extent that he was
murdered, and what do the Clintons know but Foster’s death, and why
didn’t the White House security staff know of this threatening
situation and get some help to protect the president, or just get rid
of Foster for having dangerous associates?
But
when a Trump staffer that has no personal ties to the president is
accused, simply accused, of hitting his wife, the press gives this
non-news a full-court press slamming the president. If it turns out
that the photo of Porter’s former wife was photo-shopped and is
therefore false and her accusations are a set-up deal to injure the
Trump administration, the press will give it a “never mind” and
redirect their Trump hatred elsewhere. It’s what the hit-and-run
press does.
There
can be no doubt that anyone even slightly associated with President
Trump is fair game for attacks by leftists, especially the press, and
that goes double for Trump if anyone he knows personally gets into
trouble; and you can bet that Trump will be blamed for it. This
predilection of duty by the press to attack any conservative hard and
often is not what the First Amendment to the constitution was all
about. The constitution intended no press protection for NOT
reporting news they don’t like nor for reporting only the news they
think will benefit them politically. It was intended to protect the
press when reporting news that impacts American citizens being abused
by their own government, not to attack a president for frivolous
reasons, which is what our liberal press does.
Members
of the press celebrate and applaud giving sanctuary to people who are
in this country illegally and who have committed serious crimes
against American citizens, but they give no quarter to a president
they detest, and who is undoing their hero Obama’s alleged legacy.
Our anti-Trump and anti-Conservative liberal press acts only to
undermine our nation and does nothing to protect and serve the
welfare and benefit of American citizens.
