Isn’t The Term “Leftist Supreme Court Justice” A Contradiction In Terms?

From a constitutional context the term “leftist Supreme Court Justice” is indeed contradictory because liberals hold the constitution in disdain and think that they are wiser than the founders of this nation, and they prefer to make law instead of deciding cases based on the constitution and existing law.

A few months ago a former Supreme Court Justice, John Paul Stevens, stated that he wants the constitutional provision protecting the right to bear arms for personal protection repealed, because he disagrees with it. So how did Mr. Stevens ever become a Justice on the Supreme Court where his duty was to decide the constitutionality of cases that came before him, while the entire time he was on the Supreme Court he opposed the provisions of the constitution?

Purely defining the concept of a leftist judge would convince us to keep any liberal off of the Supreme Court because leftists are, by their nature, political animals and make every decision based on liberal politics and the mood they’re in that day. Plus, they interpret cases that come before them on a case-by-case basis and not on the constitution as written. When the constitution is not the ruling authority for deciding cases, there is no way of knowing how a case would be decided: it leaves all Americans with no guiding principles with which to decide right from wrong. The truth is that liberals never decide cases based on a written document, and instead rewrite law every time they make a legal decision from the bench.

So it seems to be logical that liberals of all stripes should be kept off of the Supreme Court simply because they want society to match their idea of what society should be, not what it is nor what the constitution says should rule our nation’s policies. Our prosperous nation and the individual liberties that the constitution protects cannot be preserved with liberals on the bench.

So now President Trump is in the process of appointing another conservative to the Supreme Court and liberals are all in an uproar because they know that the constitution will be followed by a conservative justice, and laws will no longer be created anew as each case is decided by the Supremes.

Under Trump We Just Keep Winning, And I’m Not Tired Of It Yet

From climate change to Obamacare; to tax reform; to trade reform; to freedom from being forced to pay union dues; to the long-overdue denuclearization of North Korea; the United States has been winning one major victory after another against the swamp-infested, leftist forces trying to bury our free and prosperous nation under a blanket of socialist, totalitarian rule.  And all of this winning has taken place since Donald Trump took office. And although our president warned that if he was elected president we would win to the point of becoming tired of winning, I, personally, am not tired of winning yet.

And now that President Trump has the opportunity to appoint another conservative to the Supreme Court, the future, and the preservation of our constitution, seem assured and exciting.

But with all of this Trump-inspired success behind us, we must remain disciplined and move into the future and the mid-term elections coming in November, aware that the forces of anti-constitution and anti-Americanism are still out there, and they are more desperate and determined to defeat us than ever. We must back President Trump in his battles, and we must be certain to vote in each and every election.

Is Fox’s Shepard Smith A Secret Spy For CNN?

On Tuesday afternoon, on the Fox channel, I saw Shepard Smith nearly lose his cool as some leftist told him that 17 states have sued the Trump administration over the policy of separating children from parents who crossed the border with Mexico illegally.

One feels sorry for poor, sensitive Shep, who was close to shedding tears as the law suits were described, and their insistence that children between 7 and 12 years of age were too young to be separated from parents was detailed. Would the separations have been better if the children had been 5 years old, or 13 years old? No matter the age, children being removed from their parents’ protection would be unhappy. But shouldn’t it be the responsibility of the parents to not put their children in harm’s way by breaking American laws?

One strongly suspects that American liberals, the people who encouraged Central Americans to trek the dangerous length of Mexico to enter the United States, possibly sold them a bill of goods about Trump now accepting illegal immigrants as willingly as Obama did? And possibly this liberal lie tricked them into making the long and dangerous trip. Now immigrants are paying the price for believing anything American liberals tell them.

But what kind of fool is Shepard Smith to not understand that the children being separated from their parents would be of all ages, and why tell us that a certain age is too young for this to happen? Did these fool liberals care when Barack Obama did the same thing during his administration, using the same law as Trump to support the action? Why did liberals not express concern for this type of action when the law was originally written? Could the liberal lack of concern be because Obama was in charge until a year ago, and everything our savior Obama did was the right thing to do? Was the law that allows the separation of children from parents another law that was not read by legislators, passed in the middle of the night and never discussed nor debated? It’s a little too late to bemoan articles of a bill once it’s passed and put into action.

This entire scandal is on the heads of American liberals and the Central American parents who crossed our border illegally and dragged their children with them. We have laws in America and we finally have a president in Donald Trump who will actually enforce the laws on the books.

It’s becoming obvious that the only moral thing for America to do is to immediately close our borders and halt all immigration into our nation so innocent people in nations south of our border aren’t tempted to enter illegally, with the result of children being removed from their parents and bad feelings resulting from that consequence.

But closing our borders would block the Democrat party’s scheme to import more poor, uneducated, non-English-speaking people who will become dependent on government and will vote for Democrat politicians in order to keep the goodies flowing, so don’t plan on this option being approved any time soon.

Shepard Smith is too liberal and too “feely” to fit with the rest of the Fox on-air staff, and he should be let go so he can seek employment at CNN or MSNBC, where he will fit in better.

The Party Of Tolerance And Diversity Is Neither Of These Things

Based on the recent violent actions and words of the radical liberals in the Democrat party, here are some of the likely valuable principles that the DNC will run on in future elections:

* If you disagree with President Trump’s elimination of transgender people from the American military, you can kick Republicans out of your restaurant.

* If you don’t like President Trump’s treatment of immigrants trying to enter American illegally, and forgetting that Trump is following the same laws that Obama pretended to follow in previous years, you can harass Republicans in any restaurant they enter.

* If you disagree with President Trump’s immigration policy, you can stand outside the homes of all Republicans and shout insults and obscenities at them all night long.

* If you disagree with President Trump’s immigration policy, you can scream at and insult Republicans in public and keep them out of any movie theater in the nation.

* If you don’t agree with the legislation passed by Congress concerning immigration law, you can harass ICE agents and seek out the agents’ children and harass them at their schools.

* If you disagree with President Trump’s position on anything, you can threaten his son with homo-sexual rape and get away with it.

* If you ask a cake-maker or a pizza shop owner to do something contrary to their ethics and religion and if they decide to not do the work, you want done, you can sue them and ruin them financially, just “because“.

If you think that liberals, who are currently powerless at the federal level yet still make demands of private citizens and private business owners, and do violent, unconstitutional and unethical things, just wait until these radical fools get power back and take over the White House or Congress, and you’ll see an unleashing of federal power and punishment of their political rivals that will make Stalin and Hitler envious.

Since Donald Trump has been elected, we’ve learned that the Obama Administration used the FBI and the DOJ to undermine the law, and at times used false documents, generated and paid for by the Hillary campaign, that were potentially damaging to Donald Trump and his campaign. And don’t doubt that the left will continue to use the tactics of violence, intimidation and harassment, and employ the power of the IRS and the FBI, against anyone who doesn’t agree with them.

One has only to recall the Lois Lerner scandal and how the IRS denied rights to Republicans that Democrats were freely granted and benefited from to understand the threat the Democrat party offers our nation.

The future of America is one of political harassment, public abuse and official prosecution of Democrat opponents if the Democrat party gains power again. Democrats and Socialists must be defeated and unseated from all political offices, period.

Democrats, Who Attack Traditional America At Every Opportunity, Suddenly Defend American Tradition

Patriotic Americans watch in awe at the negative twist that American liberals put on anything the American constitution or existing law dictate be done, and liberals place an equally negative twist on anything and everything President Trump does and says. Here are a few recent leftist bitches and complaints liberals have registered as President Trump attempts to defend America and protect the citizens of this nation, along with the pretend-patriotic twist that liberals use to oppose our president:

1) The American flag can be burned by any third-world fool in any nation that is suffering in the poverty created by anti-American, Socialist dictators, and multi-millionaire football players can “take a knee” during the flag ceremony and the playing of the national anthem to complain about circumstances far removed from the game of football and the American left is fine with that form of disrespect for our flag, but when Donald Trump met with Kim Jong-un in an attempt to halt North Korea’s nuclear development, the American leftist press and all of the leftist media fools pretended outrage that the North Korean flag was displayed on a equal basis with the American flag and said that President Trump was disrespecting the flag with this display. Selective, anti-Trump patriotism is the only patriotism these idiot liberals can put forth.

2) The condition of our military and America’s readiness to defend itself, with a fully financed and equipped military, is low on the list of Democrat priorities. But when President Trump halted planned joint military maneuvers with American and South Korean forces in order to further his denuclearization plans with North Korea, the American left wailed and moaned that cancelling the joint maneuvers would reduce out readiness and our military preparedness to face a foreign foe, like Kim Jong-un, and they of course criticized our president for the meeting with Kim and for achieving something no former president even tried to do, that brings greater safety and security to the world.

3) The American left hates Israel and all it stands for, and has had no problem with dictatorial nations like Cuba and North Korea being represented and having anti-Israel influence on the United Nations Human Rights Council, which is totally anti-Israel in both word and deed. In fact the Obama administration hated Israel so much it sent representatives to Israel to campaign against Benjamin Netanyahu in the last Israeli election. But when the Trump administration resigned in protest from the phony, anti-liberty U. N. Human rights Council, the American left began crying about there being no representative nation remaining on the council to defend Israel against foreign criticism within the United Nations. This is the first time I’ve any liberal speak in defense of Israel, and it was intended to subvert the truth and put President Trump in a bad light.

4) The Democrat party has become not only unhinged, but absolutely violently unhinged, about the separation of children from adult invaders along our southern border, even though this process is logical and legal and has been approved by the liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. But forgotten in the liberal outrage is that the Obama administration treated the immigrant children much worse by erecting fenced cages around these children, and actually handed over many immigrant children to child traffickers because they didn’t properly vet the traffickers and caused many children to be sold for sex and slave labor uses by the cartels. But not an opposing word was spoken at the time, about these potentially criminal Obama actions. Only Trump, and Trump alone, is called a bad guy and gets violent treatment from American leftists.

5) Liberals insist on visiting child immigrant detention centers along the southern border to determine the horrible, awful, no good, very bad conditions they expect to find under President Trump, but Obama’s people kept reporters and politicians away from such camps during the Obama administration, so we‘ll never know the full extent of the Obama era mistreatment of children.

6) Democrats fret about foreign children immigrating to America, but liberals in every  Central American nation, and Mexico, advertise to the public stating how children can get to America (and then call for their families to follow once they’re here) and these ads provide information for anyone intending to immigrate illegally, detailing the correct things to say and the correct answers to give to the border patrol, which enables these anchor children and/or their parents to enter the US and be allowed to stay. Liberals never address the issue of who is responsible for the deaths and sexual mistreatment of children immigrating alone across the length of Mexico. Someone in that chain of liberal schemers should be put in jail for child endangerment. But only Donald Trump is blamed because he wants the invasion of America, and the resulting mistreatment of immigrant children by traffickers and cartels, to stop.

7) Liberals like to bemoan the danger of guns, but say nothing when a Bernie Sanders supporter shoots Republican congress members at a ballpark outside Washington. And they see no danger with liberal anti-Trump protesters shouting “Nazi” at Republicans, which only incites violence against the Republicans from good, solid, dedicated, Bernie Sanders supporters.

8) Democrats moaned and cried when President Trump met with Kim Jong-un and they accused our president of giving status to the North Korean leader with this face-to-face meeting. But Democrats swooned in adoration when President Obama schmoozed and laughed it up with Cuba’s Castro brothers while re-establishing economic relations with Cuba and supporting the murderous, totalitarian Castro regime. Liberals seem to like Communist dictators and love supporting their murderous ways.

9) Liberals in America have long supported the policy of fathers being forbidden to live with their families if the mother wanted to remain eligible for welfare support for their children. So how is this “forced separation of families” on welfare different from splitting up an immigrant family that has entered the nation illegally? This separation at the border has been found to be necessary in order to determine if the adults accompanying the children are really the parents of the  children, or a trafficker delivering them here for sale. This contradictory and confounding illogical nonsense on the part of liberals is just who these fools are.

The Party Of Planned Parenthood Is Not A Family-Friendly Party

The Democrat party, which supports Planned Parenthood with its abortions and its harvesting of baby body parts, doesn’t care a whit about family togetherness and family enjoyment, and obviously has no feeling for families being separated by government edict, as is occasionally happening at our southern border.

Democrats are a party that follows the orders of its political rulers, and the liberal press dutifully reports the news it’s told to report. That’s why, two weeks ago, we knew nothing about immigrant families being “torn apart” at our southern border, because at that point the history of this practice was all on Barack Obama, and today these separations are the only news that’s being reported by the liberal press because Donald Trump is now President and the same policies that Obama used with no notice from the press, are now major issues with the liberal elites in America. The liberal press just found a wedge issue to use against Trump, and the truth of the border problems is no more complicated than that.

Forget North Korean nukes aimed at Hawaii, all the left cares about is opposing President Trump and his efforts to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. The left opposes Trump and his attempts to halt illegal immigration for two reasons:

1) They need to replace the black voter, whose vote the Democrat party has depended on for the last 40 years, but who have recently realized the harm that liberalism has done to them and their families, and the replacement voters will be unemployed, poorly educated immigrants that the Democrat party will promise to house and feed in exchange for their vote.
2) Poor, uneducated immigrants are an easy weapon with which to criticizer President Trump as he tries to keep his campaign promise to stop this illegal flow of invaders out of our country.

Liberal Senator Chuck Schumer publicly offered Trump the use of his pen with which to sign an order reversing the President’s zero-tolerance policy, much like President Obama used his pen and phone to unilaterally and dictatorially issue illegal orders to a formally free America while he was encouraging immigrants to feely cross the border and pass into our country. But the actions of President Trump since he took office, reversing the personal policy preference, one-man’s-opinion executive orders of Barack Obama, has demonstrated how easily an executive order can be undone by the next president and Trump is insisting that Congress pass laws that will correct defective immigration policy via official congressional legislation, and he will not undermine the American constitution in the bargain with additional executive orders overriding real laws.

We can totally discount the pretend outrage of Democrats at this alleged tearing-apart of immigrant families, because President Obama did worse things during his administration and the Democrats never raised the alarm nor otherwise showed any concern for the actions of the former president who swore to “fundamentally transform America”. What we see today is exactly the fundamental transformation that Obama intended with his radical, anti-America promise.

Which Is Worse: “Toxic Masculinity” Or Toxic Progressive Liberalism?

It seems that every few years liberal  Democrats, who generally live nice, comfortable lives, have to find something to complain about, and this time their subject for attack is men.

Back in the 1970s liberals claimed that there was no difference between boys and girls, and that the nature of each sex could be manipulated by these brilliant leftists. So they made boys play with dolls and had girls play with GI Jane army toys. It soon developed, however,  that the boys were simulating fights with their dolls and the girls were hugging their GI Jane toys and putting them to bed in a rocking crib after serving them tea and cookies.

But then the heavens exploded, and in 1996 Time magazine came out with an issue that stated that “Boys and Girls Are Different”! Liberals thought that this difference between male and female was a revolutionary idea and it actually surprised them.

So now, fully into the 21at Century, we are having to live this nightmare all over again as feminist liberals frame the argument that “Toxic Masculinity’ is the destruction of our society and must be brought under control, and that men must be made more like women. One believes that they are confusing criminal males with civilized males and assume that the civilized ones are no better than the criminal ones. No one would argue that males are more aggressive than females, but the males who become criminals are usually captured and imprisoned, and by whom are they imprisoned?  Mainly by the more civilized males.

Only in modern times when we have a machine to perform or at least help with nearly any household or employment task, could women complain about the masculinity of men. Two hundred years ago, before machines and computerization, men and women played distinctly differing roles in society and the differences between the sexes made a big difference in the lives and the survival of families, and of society in general.

Given the choice, I would state that Toxic Progressive Liberalism is the worst thing that could happen to society, just as Liberal Privilege is proving itself to be destructive in the lives of patriotic Americans. There’s nothing particularly toxic about masculinity, just as there’s nothing toxic about femininity, and it’s a shame that some boys are being harmed by being given drugs for what’s been diagnosed as being ADD, with the danger that the drugs will shape their future development into something that nature never intended; so in this sense those liberals who try to take the “toxic” edge off of masculinity are just making the situation worse and more harmful than if they just left it alone and let nature take its course.

And the liberal idea of toxic masculinity is redounding to the detriment of girls and women, because the idiotic, liberal, self-identity movement is allowing boys to compete in sports against girls, and the girls are being beaten by the stronger, faster boys.  Feminists have no one but themselves to blame for this horrible development, which can be very upsetting for young women who have trained hard and long to develop a superior skill at an athletic endeavor, only to have a boy come along and beat them. It’s not fair, but feminists have yet to be introduced to the idea of fairness; all they care about is winning, defeating and dominating their fellow citizens, all of which descriptors are sort of masculine attributes, are they not? But one dare not call feminists “toxic” creatures, even when they take on masculine practices and tendencies. And they now have fifty-eight gender self-identities to compete with, following the asinine presidency of Barack Obama and his intent to “fundamentally transform America”, which is exactly what the physical, athletic competition between men and women is part and parcel of. So the field of competition gets more crowded, more frustrating and more disappointing all the time, but feminists will never admit that their grandmothers were probably more satisfied with their lot in life because their lives were led without a need to assign nasty names to men and to try to defeat and humiliate men all the time.

One feels sorry for liberals, even the feminist ones: They consistently preach political crap that is contrary to common sense and contrary to nature, and then wonder what happened when they get side-swiped, run into a figurative ditch and end up unhappy and seeking a subject to blame for their unhappiness.

The Liberal Press Either Spikes Real News, Or Floods Us With Fake News

One will recall a couple of weeks ago when the leftist press flooded the news reports, from coast to coast, with photos of  immigrant children reportedly being held in concentration camp conditions by the evil Trump administration. Every leftist news report  in the nation was abusing Donald Trump for the horrible way he was treating immigrant children, until someone discovered that the photos of immigrant children in cages were made during the Obama administration, and the pictures suddenly disappeared and related reports ceased immediately.

Ignored in the media flurry over the treatment of immigrant children is the fact that liberals celebrate the harvesting of body parts from babies that Planned Parenthood aborts, but remembering this aspect of liberal life doesn’t serve the ends of the anti-Trump crowd. To end the lives of babies for profit is acceptable, but keeping a weeping mother from her child, temporarily and in the hands of official government employees, because the mother has broken an American law, is beyond the pale to liberals. And added to this unfortunate fact, the whole truth is that American Democrats are working with Central American and Mexican leftists to continue or even increase the flow of children, many of whom are released by their parents to travel to the United States on their own, because all other news in America is in President Trump’s favor, and Democrats need this immigration issue in order to have something to attack Trump with. They’re that desperate for an issue.

Then, more recently, the hate-Trump press noticed the long-established policy of removing children from control of any adult accompanying them in their travel north, in case the child is being delivered to or by a sex-trafficker, and again Trump became a Satan for splitting up families. But there’s been no recognition on the part of the press that Trump is only following the law as written and implemented by Congress, and is doing the same thing that the Obama administration did.

If you pay attention you can also observe a very clever trick as the leftist press generates its weekly marching orders and publishes the latest anti-Trump screed that will flow simultaneously from every left-wing publication and broadcast. The best example of this liberal practice was during the Bush administration when the word “gravitas” was suddenly used one Sunday morning to mock the assembly of people that George Bush had selected to make up his administration, except for Dick Cheney who had more “gravitas” than the other members, and who Bush had announced as his Vice Presidential running mate. Rush Limbaugh recorded a hilarious montage of leftist personalities using the word gravitas, which had never before in living memory been used in a political sense, but was now the order-of-the-day for Democrats.

Liberals are nasty people, and the leftist members of the press misuse the constitution of the United States by spiking good news about President Trump and repeatedly reporting only negative, Fake News about the Trump administration

The FBI Gives A New Meaning To The Principle Of “Double Jeopardy”

Back before the 2016 presidential election, the FBI agent who oversaw the Hillary email investigation was also in charge of the initial Trump collusion investigation, and he found there to be “no there, there” related to a problem with Russia, and this finding was in spite of the express desire of the investigator to keep Trump out of the White House.

Nevertheless, after Trump became president, the collusion charges were reinstated and a special counsel was appointed to retrace old grounds. But after an additional year of investigations by the special counsel there has still been no evidence of a Trump/Russia collusion, and we know that the leftist charge of evasion of justice for the firing of James Comey is a complete crock of crap.

Leftists in government have created a new form of double jeopardy exclusively for Donald Trump: if they can’t find him guilty once, on charges on which they want to indict him, they’ll hand the investigation off to another form of prosecution and start the same old investigation all over again. Isn’t there a prohibition against double jeopardy in our constitution?

This unconstitutional persecution of a president that the main-line, Washington, liberal establishment doesn’t like, and the overlapping denial to the American voter of his and her elected presidential representative, must halt, immediately.

“We’ll Stop Him”

With these words, written by Peter Strzok, the lead FBI investigator for the Hillary email investigation and the Donald Trump presidential “we’ll stop him” campaign, this FBI employee assured his FBI pals that Donald Trump would never be elected to the White House and would never serve as president. One is reminded that all of the power of the federal government was applied to keep Trump out of the White House, but all of the money in the world could not keep the Amercian citizens from voting for the correct, patriotic person to be president.

The IG report released last Thursday demonstrated to Americans the problem our nation has with a top-level plot against the man we elected president, and we deeply resent it.

Even though the IG report stated that there was no biased effort “in writing” found to keep Trump out of the White House, we all know that there was an effort “in deed” to keep him out and to get him out at even this late date, and this effort must be punished.

Is It Starbucks Or The FBI?

The news has lately been full of established American institutions that have gone rogue and done things that they not only should not have done, but that are wrong in the deeds themselves for having been done. Here’s a little quiz to see if you can tell the difference between two of the most noteworthy newsmakers:

Which major US organization is having to send all of its employees to sensitivity training so they’ll behave appropriately with those it typically deals with? Starbucks or the FBI?

Which major US organization has been found to be replete and overflowing with virulent, partisan, leftist employees? Starbucks or the FBI?

Unfortunately both the FBI and Starbucks are answerable to the above charges. The problem is that we all knew that Starbucks was a freaky, leftist place to visit, so most of us were able to avoid it most of the time. But the FBI is the only national law enforcement agency we have, and we’ve just confirmed that it cannot be trusted to impartially investigate people involved in the national political scene, and that they always stack the deck against the anti-swamp, conservative party under suspicion. In fact Starbucks is more trustworthy than the FBI because they don’t pretend and claim to be impartial and don’t repeatedly remind us that they’re Republicans appointed by a Republican president and are therefore dependable to treat conservative suspects fairly.  We know going in that Starbucks is a radical-left organization, but the FBI is supposed to be a fair and impartial government body concerned only with enforcing the constitution and the law

What was especially angering about the little TV chat given Thursday by Christopher Wray, the Director of the FBI, at the release of the IG report on the Hillary Clinton email scandal and its investigation by the FBI, was that Mr. Wray spent time, and any time at all would be too much time, listing for the audience all of the good things the FBI has done lately, like rounding up some bad guys, and saving a few lives and locking up bank robbers, which is exactly what they’re supposed to do and what they’re bring paid to do, when the IG report listed a great many bad things that he didn’t seem to be bothered with and chose not to discuss.

And Mr. Wray’s demeanor didn’t seem to be outraged with the illegal and improper things his agents did to let Hillary slip through their fingers, while trying to nail Donald Trump onto a cross as punishment for things for which there is no evidence of his guilt at all.

One’s anger at the FBI has only been renewed and not mollified by the IG report, because I’m certain that it is an incomplete, negotiated report and is letting many bad people continue to disserve the nation with their partisan behavior, and these same culprits are quite satisfied that they are in the right in their hate of President Trump.

The Obama administration brought this great nation unlimited, illegal immigrants, a horrible Iran nuke deal, unconstitutional healthcare, a nuclear North Korea, as corrupt IRS, a weakened military, as ISIS crisis, and now we find he gave us a leftist FBI. Why does this great nation deserve this kind of bad treatment?

We can thank our lucky stars that Donald Trump is occupying the Oval Office or there would be no knowledge of the current governmental corruption and the dire situation in the DC Swamp.

One Grows Weary Of Robert De Niro

Potty mouth talk may be amusing and cute the first or even the second time it’s tried, but Robert De Niro is on the third or fourth round of vulgarly, abusing President Trump in public settings, and someone close to him should tell him to tone it down, or at least use a little intelligence and some real, meaningful words to tell us what he dislikes about President Trump.

After Donald Trump defeated Hillary for the presidency in 2016, the shock was so great that many leftists repeatedly used the “F” word against their new president. Unfortunately, given the times in which we live, this kind of edgy  public talk is expected and discounted when uttered by the likes of De Niro and his leftist pals. But the American citizens who voted for Trump and put him in the White House are delighted with his performance in office so far, and we’re tired of listening to these disappointed, spoiled Hollywood people who are used to making fantastic salaries, being feted constantly and getting their way in everything they do, operate in a deranged manner in their fog of disbelief that they lost the 2016 election. For the past year we have just turned them and their nasty mouths off and have gone about the business of our lives while continuing our support of President Trump and the miraculous things he‘s done. But it’s time the left grew up and joined us in the 21st Century, and it‘s time they behaved in a civil, decent way.

So now it’s been over a year since Trump became president, and still the most enlightened, meaningful statement De Niro can make is “f**k Trump”? The man demeans himself and weakens his legitimate opposition to Trump with these continued juvenile statements. One can give him a little slack because his audiences usually express delight when he utters his profanities, but he’s a grown man and should be able to control his mouth at least part of the time. But it begins to appear that without a script and a director to guide Mr. De Niro, he really has nothing to say of interest, and nothing of substance in his mind.

The strange thing is that the more the left abuses and mistreats President Trump, the more his supporters are reinforced in their support of him. So one supposes it would be good for the future of America if fools like De Niro continued to express themselves and their leftist frustration in the basest of ways, but one hopes that eventually our fellow-citizens on the left will join us Trump supporters in a real and sincere discussion of policy and stop the ultra-left attacks and lies they’re spreading about Trump. Democrats used to be valuable fellow citizens and patriotic political opponents, but since 2016 they have just become mean, vile, hateful rogues.

Maybe poor old Robert is just offsetting ED on-set and getting his jollies by uttering dirty words in front of adoring audiences in Hollywood and New York, but for the sake of the nation and in the interest of adult discourse, he really should be encouraged to take a different tack and express himself in an intelligent, adult manner. His audiences are doing him no favor by encouraging his bad-boy misbehavior.

But in addition to Robert De Niro, one grows increasingly weary of everyone on the left, politicians, CNN and Hollywood alike, who are so immature and juvenile that they can’t take a little disappointment once in a while, and that they can’t reflect on the absolutely wonderful, positive things that Donald Trump has presented to the nation after only 500 days in office, and stop their bitching.

Warming/Change Is Dead, So When Can Conservatives Say: “We Told You So”?

Climate change, global warming, whatever you want to call it, was one of the dumbest, most obvious, money-snatching and power-grab schemes in human history. There was never any evidence or proof of long-lasting warming of the planet, nor was the relationship between people living well and the globe getting warmer evident or even provable by alarmists. All they wanted was for America to suffer and live less well, and give money to poorer countries led by dictators who would not allow their citizens to improve their lives by allowing capitalism to be practiced in their nations.

In America the warming/change thing was a political movement that made the most radical predictions of the end of life on earth by flipping back and forth between automobiles causing warming, then claiming that the warming caused extreme cooling; then they claimed that air conditioner caused floods, and then droughts. Of course the solution to this problem, that America was responsible for, was for Americans to give up all the things our advanced nation has developed and become used to. But all of this clap-trap ended when Donald Trump became president and saved our nation from the Paris Accords which would have doomed us if it had proceeded as the United Nations designed it.

The warming/change movement was never based on science but rather was based on a computer program that predicted the exact most disastrous things the left could think of, and then produced the results they designed, wanted and intended. This politicization of weather was ridden like a lame horse by the radical leftists and the liberal press.

But on September 18, 2017, The Telegraph produced an article that showed the scientific mal- or misfeasance of the leftist by reporting problems with things like “carbon 14 dating” data, and “CO2 uptake not (being) as predicted”, all of which was to say that they were wrong. So with the passing of the corrupt Obama administration, the real facts are coming out and the lies are being admitted to and reversed.

Along the same lines of how much corruption America would have had if Hillary had become president and the lies and crimes of the FBI and the DOJ had not been exposed by the Trump administration, one may also wonder whether we would have ever heard of these environmental second thoughts and reversals in the warming/change scheme if Hillary had won the 2016 election. She would probably be overseeing an inundation of corporate environmental regulations, designed, of course, to save the planet, that would seriously obstruct and weaken America’s industries, the unemployment rate would be even higher than Obama’s record-setting trend, and the Democrats would be forcing carbon taxes on Americans and giving the money to the rulers of Haiti, Somalia, Cuba and North Korea for the nasty way America has treated these unfortunate nations the last 200 years.

The environmental movement was always clearly an anti-capitalist and anti-American effort to milk money from Americans and divert it to leftist, non-democratic interests. And since the admission that the scheme was always a lie was first produced nine months ago, I think it’s about time to spread the word more broadly and get this anti-American movement buried for good.

Obama Was Exposed By His “Pen And Phone” Threat

If anyone needed help understanding the totalitarian tendency of Barack Obama, his statement, made in January of 2014, that he didn’t need Congress to get things done due to his having a “pen and a phone”, with which he could do any damned thing he wanted to do from his dominating perch in the White House, was all you need to know in order to understand our beloved Obama. And this evil man proved that he was indeed telling the truth about his intentions for running the country via his subversive practices.

He got America into the Climate Change agreement using only his personal pen. He locked us into the Iran nuke deal, again, solely with his pen, and offering no information to, nor input from, Congress to agree or disagree with him on the national policy he was establishing  based on his own, personal preference.. And he did virtually the same thing with Obamacare, because although the bill had been passed by Congress, with only Democrat votes, and without ever being read by legislators, most aspects and provisions of the bill were left open for the Obama administration to fill in the blanks as they saw fit and in the manner with which they wished to impose this unconstitutional bill on the American public.

This pen and phone gambit, along with the numerous other unconstitutional, unwise, dangerous and illegal things our former president chose to do, was how Obama intended to “fundamentally transform America“, and he did it with no consideration for the impact these things would have on the economy or on the conduct of government following his administration‘s departure. Although Obama was undeniably intelligent, he was a fool in the manner in which he undermined the security and prosperity of America.

Obama’s “pen and phone” statement said all that needs to be said about his disrespect for the American public and for any pretense of a rule of law or a respect for the constitution, and it explains a lot about the dictatorial nature of his presidency.

Starbucks CEO, A Liberal, White, Male May Run For President

Starbucks Executive Chairman, Howard Schultz, is stepping down from the company he’s run for the last 10 years, and is not denying that he may run for president one day. But, being the good liberal that he is, how can he attempt to win such an important position when his white privilege is what got him the Starbucks gig in the first place, and his unintentional racism is what caused the recent kerfuffle with black men being arrested for using the Starbucks restroom, which resulted in quite a shake-up at Starbucks shops around the world, as the liberal employees there were allowing their own unintentional racism to offend poor black men.

Some questions for Mr. Schultz to consider before he decides to run for the presidency:

If the CEO of a set of small coffee shops like Starbucks cannot control the actions of his already-liberal employees, how can he run an entire nation?

If Starbucks employees, people already steeped in liberal philosophy, can offend minority customers, how can Mr. Schultz pretend to run our diverse nation?

Following the above-mentioned restroom kerfuffle, Mr. Schultz jumped to a quick decision about Starbucks restrooms and who can use them, and then had to rescind his ill-thought, leftist-tilted initial order and go with plan B. And, because of Shultz’ poorly and hastily developed plan B, the Starbucks chain is now jokingly referred to as the largest public restroom chain in the world. If Mr. Schultz becomes president and our nation goes to war with a foreign nation, will our nation survive with an ill-considered plan A that falls on its face, and be able to survive a quickly assembled plan B?

With liberals preaching to us daily about how nasty, racist and misogynistic men are, and how privileged whites are, how can Mr. Schultz, who is both white and male, even think of making a presidential bid, which may both add to the white/male disaster we are told our nation has been burdened with, and would perhaps be denying a black woman her chance to become president and solve all the nation’s problems in one perfect, black and female sweep? It’s clear that Mr. Schultz’s longstanding privilege has clouded his mind as to even the possibility of fairness and equity in America, as liberals like to remind us on an hourly basis.

Actually it’s liberal privilege that is destroying America, not white privilege, and not white men. Hillary’s liberal privilege caused the FBI to not even assemble a Grand Jury to review her email security crimes, but Donald Trump’s Republicanism has gotten him investigated for over a year for absolutely no crime at all, and no evidence of such a crime ever happening. So the white and male thing can be forgotten, and the liberal privilege thing is what America must stop in order for common sense to return again.

Mr. Schultz is proving that he is not qualified for the White House move, since his white, male guilt has blinded him to his obvious crimes of being the wrong sex and having the politically incorrect color of skin. But liberals are good ones for demanding that we do as they say, and then exempting themselves from their own laws and commands.

Elitist, Leftist NYT Columnist Expresses Immature, High School-Girl Adoration For Obama

On June 2nd columnist Maureen Dowd, of The New York Times, wrote a sappy, slurpy, teenage-girl piece in adoration of Barack Obama and his basically unconstitutional presidency. She praised Obama  for his brilliance and claimed that he was too smart for we American plebes, who believe in limited government and a constitutionally defined and controlled presidency.

No one would doubt the intelligence of Barack Obama, although I would also add Ronald Regan and Donald Trump to any list of smart presidents, but intelligence does not make a person good, nor does it make one a wise leader. Barack Obama was a conceited, big government, upper class, liberal progressive who was certain that he was wiser than anyone else living in the swamp, and the liberal press repeatedly and always confirmed this impression he had of himself, and he insisted on running his administration with no reference to the constitution as a guide to keep him on track and legal.

In her article, order to describe her adoration for Obama, columnist Down used descriptive phrases such as: “the glory days of 2008”; “honest and cool and modern”; “his amazing awesomeness”; and “we were constantly disappointing him”. What in the hell does any of Dowd’s fawning words have to do with running a government and protecting a nation from attack?

And of course, being a liberal, the author was unable to keep from mentioning Obama’s race at least six times during her rant of adoration, as if skin color makes someone wise and adds to their ability to run a government. Liberals, progressives, the press and Democrats in general have gone completely off their perches with the loss of the presidency to Donald Trump and the reversal of all of the “awesome” and “cool” things Obama did in eight years in the Oval Office.

The stupid, racist and leftist pap of Ms Dowd’s article had the title of “Obama: Just Too Good For Us“. So, knowing this in advance, you should be able to bolter your sensibilities and prepare your intelligence against her worthless words, should you be unfortunate enough to read her article.

Is Post-Obama America Becoming Heathenistic and Cultish?

In ancient Indian and Egyptian religions, transformation ceremonies were common as humans believed they could become buffalo or lions. In that context, one fears we are seeing too much similarity to this transformative aspect of ancient cultures with today’s leftist trend toward self-identity.

Are these heathenistic beliefs, in a post-Obama America, causing “progressive” Democrats to join the ranks of heathens with their ideas of self-identity, their rejection of duly passed laws, and their push for legal drug use as a way of overcoming the pain and disappointment at the turn the nation has taken with a truly “transformative” President, by the name of Donald Trump, who is helping America overcome the leftist, debasing swing of the old Obama administration?

Drug use has always been popular with those who are unable to deal with the real world they find themselves in, but the recent self-identity crisis of Democrats, who seem to believe they are something other than what they were born as, or who at least want to fool themselves into believing they are something different, is of concern. And their leftist pals, who are also afloat in a world they don’t like, don’t understand and can’t cope with, go along with the self-identity farce of their weakest associates and do nothing to try to make them accept and improve on reality.

Ancient societies have used masks and drugs, as today’s youth use tattoos and marijuana to pretend they are transforming themselves, when all they are doing is destroying the stable, prosperous society they were born into, because all such heathenistic societies did, in fact, disappear, often violently.