Democrat Officials Go From Anti-White To Anti-Male Stances, Which Includes Anti-Kavanaugh Politics

Citizens who pay attention to current political events know that Democrat women seek high political positions because they say men, who traditionally solely occupied the House and Senate, can’t be trusted to represent women and women’s issues in the legislation they pass. These Democrat women seem to ignore the fact that Republican (not Democrat) men passed the legislation that gave women the vote, just as it was Republican men (all white, and none of them Democrats) who finally got the Civil Rights bill passed into law.

If you will recall the radical verbiage that came from Hillary Clinton’s mouth during the 2016 presidential campaign you will remember that she referred to all citizens who prefer Trump as “deplorables”, and she also said that she did not seek support from whites nor males any longer, which seems to suggest that she went full racist and sought only black, female votes to place her in the Oval Office. One wonders what she thinks of this racist, sexist politics at this late date.

With the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court hearings chaos, and especially with the anonymous sexual attack-victim charges against Kavanaugh, Senator Mazie Hirono, a Democrat from Hawaii, said that men should “just shut up” after some men tried to introduced some sanity into the very late-arriving charges against Judge Kavanaugh and expressed doubt about the last-minute, long-withheld, surprise charges now launched against him, and the good senator said that men should have no input in the discussion since it was a man who was being charged by the anonymous and still not released mysterious note that was sent to Senator Dianne Feinstein back in July.

With all of her criticism of men, I wonder how Senator Hirono can explain how the woman’s movement of the 60s and 70s has left women like Christine Blasey Ford, the accuser of Brett Kavanaugh, so weak that she needs to insist on numerous special conditions and more time to prepare before she will appear in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee and present her evidence of Kavanaugh’s bad actions. The woman’s movement insisted that women be treated exactly like men, but Ms Ford wants special conditions and special consideration before she will testify. One would think that if she really has information hurtful to Kavanaugh that proves his mistreatment of her, that she would be willing to show up tomorrow and testify, but she says she’s “afraid”, which is really a strong feminist position to take in such a serious matter, and after causing all of this trouble because of her own vague note. I believe this whole matter is just a stall, and Ms Ford should be subpoenaed if she doesn’t show up to testify next week, just like a man would be.

So it seems beyond doubt that if we get many more radical, leftist, Democrat, men-hating women like Senator Hirono in the House or Senate, men will no longer have adequate representation and may be in danger of losing representation completely with vicious, sexist attitudes like hers. America is moving to the radical left with great speed since the Democrats lost an assured-win election to Donald Trump in 2016, and one is wise to fear what will happen to any of our constitutional rights if the Democrats take control of the House or Senate in the future, and heaven help us all if they get the White House again.

One sure thing that the Kavanaugh/Ford kerfuffle has demonstrated to the nation is that Democrats are frightened out of their skin at losing the liberal majority on the Supreme Court, which is their last bastion of being able to write and rewrite laws by making unconstitutional decisions from the bench. The voting majority in America has lately been casting votes against liberals and is rejecting the leftist’s socialistic tendencies, which are demonstrated by their abandoning of the traditions and norms that have made America great, which everyone knows will lead to our economic and social destruction. The liberal fallback position to laws they don’t like is a left-leaning Supreme Court, and Brett Kavanaugh threatens this last line of liberal defense, so they‘ll fight him tooth and nail in an attempt to keep him off the Bench, and will destroy him and his family if that‘s what it takes to get rid of him.

From Thomas To Bork To Kavanaugh: Conservatives Need Not Apply For The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s “high tech lynching”, carried out by the Democrats in The United States Senate in 1991, is being played out again in the DC swamp, by Democrats once again, but against Brett Kavanaugh this time in a suspicious October Surprise revelation of an alleged high school sexual attack by Kavanaugh on a girl, an event that Kavanaugh swears never happened, and that the accusing girl cannot recall the date of nor the home where this alleged event was supposed to have happened. But the California, liberal University Professor woman making these claims seems to recall Kavanaugh clearly enough.

The entire revelation, which mysteriously follows Kavanaugh’s personal interviews with Senators, following a week of public questions directed at the Supreme Court candidate, and after numerous FBI investigations from the nominee’s past, and after the woman from 35 years ago who is making the charges has cleansed her internet and social media of evidence of personal and professional leftist leanings.

This is an obvious political attack, not only on the nominee, but on the whole Supreme Court appointee approval process conducted by the U.S. Senate, and one sincerely hopes that this misconduct by Senate Democrats will doom these fool politicians in the 2018 mid-term elections.

Republican Senators must realize that the ultra-hardball, scorched earth attitude of Democrats must be opposed by the entire Republican party, because Democrats are doing everything in their power to do anything, say anything, destroy any life to gain power following the election of Donald Trump to the Presidency, and this unconstitutional attack mode by Democrats has to be stopped before all standards of propriety and distinction are completely gone from our political competitions.

Damn the lying, unprincipled Democrats to political hell forever.

Liberals Gladly Forgive Convicted Felons, But Allow No Break For Brett Kavanaugh

Liberals stumble all over themselves showing compassion for convicted felons and illegal aliens, and promoting shorter (or no) sentences for prisoners, and have even given the vote to former prisoners, I suppose because prisoners can be depended on to vote for their pals-in-crime, Democrat politicians. But when it comes to raw politics, Democrats will give no break to an honest, successful man who stands in the way of their political goals, as Brett Kavanaugh does.

Barack Obama, the leading Democrat politician, loved to kick back, drink a mint Julep and have a good laugh with the vicious, murderous Castro brothers of Cuba, and he favored giving tens of billions of dollars in untraceable cash to the leading supporters of terrorism in the world, the Iranian leadership, and Democrat politicians and the leftist press were good with these things. But when it comes to fair consideration for a conservative Supreme Court nominee who respects the constitution, there’s no way fair consideration will be given.

Liberals will not give a break to a man who has never been charged with a crime, never been convicted of any illegal act, who was rated top of his law school class, who became a White House legal advisor, who has served on the Federal bench for years, who has raised a beautiful family, who volunteers at a DC soup kitchen, and who has been endorsed by many men and women he has known for many years, but who is now suffering from a strike, from out of the blue, when a woman suddenly accused him of a non-specified sexual act from 35 years ago, and who doesn’t even know the date of the alleged sex act nor where they were at the time of the long-ago alleged meeting.

Democrats politicize everything they touch, and they’re willing to ruin Brett Kavanaugh’s life and the lives of his family on this unsubstantiated charge from a likely leftist, California college professor, all for the crime of being nominated by a conservative president named Trump. And the suffering professor never reported the alleged violation to police and has been silent for 35 years, until the Supreme Court vetting process is at an end and the appointee is ready to sit for a vote in the Senate this week. This is very suspicious timing, at a time when the political left has been replete with suspicious, lying charges and fake news about everyone related to President Trump.

Never charged with any wrong-doing, never convicted of anything, but holding on strongly to conservative values and being a religious man (and being appointed by Donald Trump) are all it takes for Democrats to hang him from the nearest tree with no trial and no hearing. Kind of like Clarence Thomas’s 1991 “high tech lynching” at the hands of the party of the KKK and blocked schoolhouse doors.

Google, And Other Giants Of Technical Wizardry, Are A Clear And Present Danger To America

We now learn that Google management was so upset and distraught at the election of Donald Trump that they were willing to share their tears and have their disappointment recorded so they could demonstrate to the liberal world what good, reasonable, level-headed people they are in their insane opposition to President Trump.

When have you ever heard a local plumbing company, or even a giant company like the Ford Motor Company, express an opinion on the outcome of an election? Corporations don’t vote for political candidates and it’s earth-shaking that a corporation like Google should break with American tradition and express political views as a corporate entity. It’s possible, in fact even likely, that many plumbers and many employees of Ford were disappointed by the election, but they didn’t make public fools of themselves, as if we care how they wanted the election to come out. In fact, I take this recorded event by Google to be a gauntlet being thrown down: these people think they are the only smart ones, and their opinion is all that matters, and as a public corporation they see themselves to be superior to all individual Americans who voted for Trump.

Conservatives were devastated when Barack Obama was elected president because we knew that he would use his race to divide America, and that he would use his liberalism to do unconstitutional, economically damaging things to this great nation, and we were right. But we didn’t record our disappointment at the election loss, because we knew that there would be other elections in the future which our side might win, and we respect the results of any fair, straight-up election because it represents the will of the voters.

With the election of Donald Trump conservatives did get their candidate elected, and now liberal Democrats will not recognize his presidency and are doing everything in their power to get him removed from office, or at least have all of his policy initiatives blocked with their lies and investigations. The know-it-all crowd like Google and Twitter, will not tolerate a loss and a rejection of their superior wisdom, and that intolerance is part of the unbelievable, scandalous way President Trump has been treated since his election, and it’s not going to stop.

Exactly who the hell do these fool, far-left, multi-millionaires think they are, and who gives a damn about their sorrows? I voted for Trump and was very pleased at his election because it meant that Hillary would not be able to further damage this great nation. But the losers, as represented by the recording of the Google board, tell me that they have no respect for an elected president if they disagree with his policies, and they have no respect for the Americans who voted for Trump.

I also noticed that English was not the first language of many of the speakers on the recording, and at least a portion of the audience were foreign, so how can these foreigners, who are in America earning large salaries that could and should be going to American citizens, pretend to be disappointed at the way Americans run their own nation?

These high-tech people, their superior attitudes and the way they prohibit people with differing opinions from searching or passing messages and thoughts over their platforms, will continue to disallow differing opinions to exist, to the limit that they can, and I fear they recognize no limitation over their ability to halt thinking and expression contrary to their own.

Liberal Hurricane Death Toll Magic: Revise Calculations Upward; Blame Trump

If Obama can take credit for the current roaring economy after 18 months into the Trump presidency, then why is he exempt from blame for the damage and deaths caused by the hurricanes during the same post-Obama interval?

Or to state it differently, how can Obama take credit for the good Trump economy, but liberals still blame Trump for any damage resulting from a hurricane that followed quickly on Obama’s exit from the White House.

Or a third way of stating the hate-Trump phenomenon: how can Obama go into history with no damage to his memory for hurricane destruction, but current-day liberals get to manipulate the figures of storms that have occurred during Trump’s term of office (for example Hurricane Maria, which hit Puerto Rico in 2017) and increase the death toll from 65 proven dead citizens at the time of the hurricane, to 2975 deaths a year later? Where is the proof for this insanely inflated number? And, assuming there is any validity to this new and growing total, one wonders if the recent discovery of hundreds of thousands of bottles of water, found in a warehouse in Puerto Rico, could have possibly contributed to  the suffering of Puerto Ricans. What other FEMA emergency supplies were stored, or perhaps sold for personal profit, by Puerto Rican officials?

The government officials in Puerto Rico were in agreement with the official toll of 65 deaths for nearly a year, so why would we not suspect tampering with the figures with this new revelation? And of course the new number must be accompanied with blame for President Trump, with the liberal Democrat officials in Puerto Rico escaping any blame at all.

As of two days ago the liberal swamp establishment of the United States was already blaming President Trump, in advance of landfall, for a Hurricane (Florence) that hadn’t even hit the east coast yet, stating that he is complicit with the storm. They’ll probably add this complicity to Mueller’s growing list of reasons to investigate Trump until the end of time.

Are Tucker Carlson and Bernie Sanders Joining Forces Against Jeff Bezos?

The wild world of politics can get goosey at times. For some time now Bernie Sanders (a liberal socialist and a millionaire) has been making fun of Jeff Bezos (a liberal and the wealthiest man in the world) because Bezos’s companies have many employees who earn so little at their jobs that they also need government-provided welfare to keep body and soul together.

One suspects that Bernie is just pulling the old Jesse Jackson trick of shaking down a rich businessman and is trying to coerce some cash from Bezos, and for a while I thought that Tucker Carlson, who has been reporting Sanders’ badgering of Bezos on his nightly Fox television program, was just making fun of Sanders because the leftist senator from Vermont is a rich, socialism-espousing hypocrite.

But Mr. Carlson, whose Fox TV program I dote on and watch faithfully, is taking his ridicule of Bezos more seriously than I’m comfortable with, by comparing Bezos’s under-paying an employee with a moral issue, because some employees’ lack of income causes the average American to have to subsidize the Amazon empire with higher taxes and more federal bureaucracy in order to provide financial assistance to those employees. It seems that Tucker may have missed the point that businesses are not established to assure a large income to employees, but were rather set up to make money for the employer.

The argument that Amazon is under-paying its employees reminds me of some fool union organizer who used to appear occasionally as a talking head on TV, and always took the opportunity to bash Wal-Mart for under-paying its employees and not allowing unionization of their stores, while at the same time he would ridicule Wal-Mart employees for continuing to work for peanuts at the evil Wal-Mart. This more-intelligent-than-thou ridicule of employees for working for any particular company is insulting to the employees who are the best deciders of whom they will work for and how much money they will accept for their efforts.

There’s also the argument that an employer, such as Wal-Mart and Amazon, must decide the salary that’s advantageous for them to pay for the positions for which they are hiring. So as things have always worked, the employer sets the salary and  the employee accepts or rejects the job offered. It seems that Tucker may be stepping on the toes of both the employer and the employee with his anti-Bezos position, just like the anti-Wal-Mart lackey criticized Wal-Mart, but it’s none of a third-party’s business. Salaries are negotiable and a person working for an employer has already accepted the employer‘s offer.

One hopes Tucker is just poking fun at the left in his aligning with dumb old Bernie, and I share his making fun of both Sanders and Bezos.

Democrats Establish a New Low-Bar Norm For Violent Behavior

No one can have forgotten the Bernie Sanders supporter who last year shot up the Republican House baseball team at a park in Alexandria, Virginia, wounding several Representatives and nearly killing Steve Scalese. The liberal media let this particular shooting slide with little coverage, and there was absolutely no coverage of how violent and deranged Democrats have become since Donald Trump became the Republican candidate for president, and especially since he won the election against Hillary and began undoing Obama’s big-government paradise, as he promised to do during the campaign.

Even the “anonymous” NYT story, which was supposedly from a member of the Trump White House staff, admitted that most of President Trump’s initiatives and policies have been good for America and Americans, so why have the fake press and Democrat politicians been reporting how mean Trump is and how he wants to kill Americans and wants to starve people he disagrees with and wants to yank children from the arms of their mothers and is undermining long-held traditions of our nation?

I ask this question because all of the misbehavior and violence we’ve seen since Trump entered the presidential race in  2016 has come from the left, not from Republicans. Hillary hired union thugs to attack Trump supporters during the presidential campaign; Obama’s DOJ and the FBI illegally generated false documents abusive of Trump and proceeded to use them to defeat candidate Trump in the 2016 election, and still use them today in the Russia/collusion investigation; fools like Maxine Waters repeatedly stir up anger at Trump and his staff and encourages her followers to confront them; leftist news panels talk of how horrible Republicans are with their murderous policies and the suffering that the mean Republicans are causing for Americans, especially blacks and Hispanics, thereby encouraging and justifying attacks on the evil, deserving Republicans.

Then yesterday (September 11, 2018) we got word that a crazy California man with  a switchblade knife attacked a Republican running for the US Congress. Let me guess how thoroughly this type of violent action is being covered by CNN and MSNBC: probably not at all. And with the attack on the baseball field last year and now this outrage of a knife attack, both of these violent, potentially fatal acts committed by Democrats on Republicans, one would think that the liberal press would draw the conclusion that Democrats are out of their minds with all of the lies, attacks and accusations they heap on the followers of President Trump, but they don’t.

The Republican who was attacked is running to unseat Democrat Representative Eric Swalwell who is the current member of the house from that district and is himself one of the biggest liars on the political scene today and proposes and holds attitudes that only an insane person could hold. I’ll bet that Mr. Swallwell has not condemned violent attacks on Republican politicians, because from what I’ve seen and heard of him, he’s probably taking lessons from Maxine Waters on how to confront and intimidate Republicans in order to keep them out of office so a Democrat majority can impeach President Trump following the 2018 election.

Democrats are the party of violence and unconstitutional motivations and must be kept out of any public office forever. When you realize that shooting and knifing their opponents are how Germany’s National Socialist party got rid of competition and political opposition and was able to take control of the government in the 1930s, you begin to realize that the new, violent norm for political behavior that Democrats have embraced is a clear and present danger to America and our liberty. Without a concerted effort from the Democrat party and the lying press to stop violent reactions to anything Republicans do, there will be no end to it.

Obama Goes From: No Economic Growth Possible, To: I Built That!

One may recall the Obama statement, during his stagnant eight years of idly occupying the Oval Office, that the “new economy” which followed the downturn in 2008, will never replace the growth years of Reagan and Clinton and can’t possibly grow at a rate greater than one to two percent a year. Well the widely declaimed and insulted Donald Trump proved the fool Obama wrong.

And now our savior Obama has arisen again to assure us that President Trump is only taking credit for his, Obama’s, great economy, which The One said could never grow again and would languish forever at low- to no-growth, because manufacturing jobs will never come back since there’s no demand for them in these post-industrial years.

But the truth is that either Obama didn’t want economic growth, but preferred a growing dependence on hand-outs and welfare from big government, or he simply was too lazy and too liberal-left dumb to know what to do to create economic growth. Probably Obama was both lazy and dumb.

But Donald Trump had both the energy to spur the economy and the knowledge of what to do to reverse the suffering of the American people and get the economy running again. After he reversed Obama’s job-killing regulations, and got rid of the Paris accords, and began defeating ISIS, and lowered taxes, and spoke well of industry and its importance to the economic welfare of all Americans, and began to re-negotiate trade deals with each major trading partner we have in the world, things that the lug-headed Obama would never have done even if he understood their value to Americans, we had a miraculous increase in employment statistics that Obama is now taking credit for.

Obama is back on the campaign trail again attempting a comeback to stardom as the only Democrat left standing since Trump became president, and is using cheap theater to appear attractive and enthusiastic. During a speech one might notice Obama’s alternation between a bobble-head and a freeze-frame style of delivery, while employing a cynical smirk as a facial feature. This phony attempt at gaining support for a range of old-style, Democrat, big-government, unconstitutional, anti-police, job-killing policies will never hold up against the straight-forward, humorous, truthful speeches in front of thousands of enthusiastic admirers that President Trump has been delivering the last few weeks.

Old bobble-head Obama is powerless without his “phone and pen”, which method of leading was a bad idea when he was in office, and is the reason his failing policies were so easily reversed by our real president, Donald Trump.

Leftist Authoritarians And Their “Periods”

Leftists are used to getting weekly scripts of words and phrases that are approved by their radical, lying press/political leaders, for use the next seven days; that’s why at one point all liberals used the identical comment indicating that President George Bush had very little “gravitas”. When was the last time you heard the word “gravitas” used in any context, especially related to a president of the United States?

Another word that, when used by leftists, should be a measure of their dishonesty and lack of  trustworthiness, is the word “period”. One will fondly recall the savior Barack Obama repeating upward of 30 times the following phrases while trying to sell Obamacare to America:

“You can keep your doctor, period. You can keep your plan, period. You will save $2500 a year, period.”

Since we all know that the sainted Obama was a bald-faced liar with each reference to his unconstitutional Obamacare, so liberals should be more careful when using the emphatic “period” in any context. But liberals are so wrapped up in their own importance and with their intended “fundamental transformation of America” that they are unable to think outside their radical message, so they make the repeat mistake of using Obama’s favorite word, as did Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey last week in a congressional hearing when he said that his company does not engage in shadow banning of conservatives, “period”.

As far as I’m concerned the liberal CEO of Twitter just told the truth about his company, and since we know the code to deciphering leftist truths, we know exactly what he said, and we know that he meant it.

Who Is The Anonymous NYT Author? Perhaps The NYT?

Maybe I missed it along the fake news line of lies somewhere, but in all of the speculation about who, allegedly on the White House staff, wrote the anonymous Trump attack piece published in the New York Times OP-ED section last week, I would bet it’s just another in a long line of leftist lies aimed at hurting President Trump and his re-establishment of liberty and prosperity in America following his miraculous election victory over Hillary’s forces of darkness.

If the source is determined to be a person on the Trump staff and not a piece of fiction from NYT liberals, then at least it demonstrates that Trump was willing to give a person not fully on his side a chance to work in the administration, something you would never see from an Obama or a Clinton administration. All liberal rulers insist on complete subservience to their divisive, destructive policies, or you-know-what will happen to them. To that end there are stacks of liberals sitting around waiting for a government job and the chance to “Fundamentally Transform America” who are willing to subvert a conservative administration or dutifully serve a Democrat president, whereas Republicans are too busy working in the private sphere of business, seeking real accomplishment in private industry, and consider it to be a waste of time to seek or accept government work. This means there are few conservative people available for Trump to call on to serve on his staff, so he had to take a second choice for some position, and this less-than conservative choice decided that his/her leftist ideas should prevail over the ideas of a duly elected Trump, and this person deceived and lied to his/her employer, the president of the United States. If it should be determined that this anonymous author had access to classified information while serving the president, he/she must be tried and imprisoned for their crime.

Given that the NYT OP-ED article admitted that most of what President Trump has done is good and is beneficial to Americans, exactly what was it that the author of the article thought was so bad about Trump policies, and what exactly were the bad things that he/she was able to stop?

Given the outrageous statements of liberals and leftist politicians lately, with their total opposition to anything President Trump wants to do, it seems certain that the OP-ED author surely tried to ban ICE from enforcing duly passed immigration laws; to halt the recently passed tax relief bill; to fully re-establish the unconstitutional Obamacare; to back away from denuclearization talks with North Korea; to allow Iran to continue to develop a nuke and a delivery missile; to enact more job-killing regulations on businesses in America; to prevent the building of a wall along our southern border. All of these things are counter to Trump policies, so the author must have thought that blocking each of Trump’s initiatives would be a good idea.

So where are the specifics of the great anti-Trump things the author was able to do that he/she thinks is so great? Anyone who has the ability to think independently and logically knows that everything President Trump has proposed since becoming President is a GOOD thing and is in keeping with his campaign promises, so anything the author proposed that was contrary to what the president wants, must be bad. This also makes the author bad, so the more we learn about this individual, the better.

In 2018 and 2020 the American people will get the chance to state clearly whose side they’re on, Trump’s or the subversive OP-ED writer, and I’ll bet that the ideas and policies of Donald Trump win in both elections.

Liberals Mistake The Truth For Abuse

It always angers me when I hear anyone state that we have to halt the abusive, divisive political attacks on BOTH sides. Both sides? Excuse me but the only thing Republicans or Donald Trump did that was divisive was to win a series of elections, and Democrats consider that to be abusive.

On the other hand:
* It was Hillary’s campaign that hired union thugs to beat Trump supporters in the 2016 campaign.
* It was the Hillary campaign that paid for the Dossier that originated the Trump/Russia lie. And it was Hillary that reported the money spent on the Dossier illegally to the FEC.
* It was the FBI that took the fake Dossier to the FISA court and improperly got permission to spy on a fellow American.
* It was the FBI officials who swore to keep Donald Trump out of the White House and launched an investigation into the lie of collusion to assure Trump’s defeat or impeachment.

Donald Trump has been heavily and deeply investigated by the special counsel and the only violations of the law that the investigators have found is the illegal activities of Hillary, the FBI and the DOJ, and no one in Mueller’s crew is even suggesting the prosecution of these deep state criminals.

The only abused entity here is Donald Trump, and it’s incredible how many news writers and news sources, reporting breath-taking revelations about Trump and how evil he is, are anonymous and are too cowardly to stand up and be counted.

From the Dossier, to the FBI warrant, to the New York Times “Trump insider” article published Wednesday, the left lies with every breath they take and tries to undermine the duly elected Trump presidency, while all along Donald Trump keeps improving our lives, keeping the nation safe and filling our pocket books, and he does exactly what the American people elected him to do.

When President Trump exposes the true nasty nature of liberals in politics or in the news, they take this exposure as abuse and fire off more divisive lies bout Trump.

Hail Spartacus! Spartacus Is A Fool!

Cory Booker, US Senator from New Jersey, claimed the status of self-appointed hero for releasing forbidden documents he thought would hurt the chances of Bret Kavanaugh being approved as a Justice to the Supreme Court, in the Senate hearings held on Thursday. So he released the documents and then challenged the leaders of the Senate to punish him for doing so, and proclaimed himself a Spartacus figure for being so principled, strong and brave.

Poor, dumb, heroic Cory later learned that the documents he claimed to have bravely released were actually already approved for release, were not forbidden at all, and the information in the documents was actually not injurious to Kavahaugh’s chances of approval at all, but instead reinforced the fact that the Supreme Court appointee was no kind of racist, as the leftist radicals randomly claim about every opponent to their idiot politics that can‘t legitimately be defeated on facts and policies.

Will the idiot Democrats ever mature to the point where they behave like civilized, principled, responsible servants of the people?

Hail the Fool Booker, and vote Republican!!

Democrats Should Never Go Out In Polite Public

After watching the horrendous display on Tuesday, of Senate Democrats goading, insulting and trying to get a negative response from Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in the opening hearings in his confirmation proceedings, I fear the future of America with Democrats in it, especially if they are running it. Brett Kavanaugh is a fine man and does not deserve the nasty treatment that Democrats are imposing on him. Democrats repeatedly criticize President Trump for non-presidential actions, but Democrats are much worse than Trump because there is never any humor, and rarely any truth, in what they say, unlike Trump who is always on target with the points he makes, yet adds humor to the things he says.

Democrats insist on allowing America-hating illegal aliens, who far too often bring disease, ignorance, poverty and crime with them as they enter this nation, to do as they wish once here. From hiring union thugs to beat on Trump supporters during the latest presidential campaign; to the ANTIFA criminals who beat people just to beat something; to anti-free-speech leftist punks who burn and trash college campuses as their way of challenging conservative visitors to campus; to trans-sexual, self-identity advocates who insist that all Americans must embrace and accept their deviant way of life and their radical views, these fools destroy America’s traditions and its constitution.

If Democrats are not insulting and trying to imprison the duly elected President Donald Trump or someone on his staff, they’re praising unelected tyrants like the murderous Castro brothers of Cuba or the dictators of Iran to whom Barack Obama gave billions of dollars in cash to finance terrorist groups intent on murdering Americans.

Democrats are radical, violent, thoughtless, impolite, base people who should remain indoors so as not to embarrass themselves with their crude behavior, and hopefully their absence from public display will allow our nation to heal and become dignified again.

Republicans Go Low and Democrats Go High? I Don’t Think So.

One will recall the memorable words of Michelle Obama when she said that Republicans go low and Democrats respond by going high. So maybe we’d better determine what going “low” means.

In 2016 Americans  elected Donald Trump to be President of the United States, and since that time Democrats have been rioting, burning, calling him a racist and a traitor, accosting his staff in restaurants, writing fake news stories about him and his policies, accusing ICE agents of behaving like thugs and launching ANTIFA storm troops at peaceful Republican assemblies. You can’t get much lower than that.

I would say that the free, duly held election could be considered going high and that the violence and the leftist lying coming from the liberals could be considered going low. So what does this say about Democrats?